Seek Returns

BKR vs. IMO: Baker Hughes vs. Imperial Oil Stock Comparison

How do Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO) both fall under the Energy industry group, but BKR is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while IMO is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.

Company profile comparison for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
Profile ItemBKRIMO
NameBaker Hughes CompanyImperial Oil Limited
Country/RegionUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesIntegrated Oil & Gas
Market Capitalization47.54 billion USD58.92 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE American
Listing DateApril 6, 1987March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

BKR
IMO
GSPC
Loading price history…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricBKRIMO
Total Return (1Y)3.17%35.68%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)15.12%34.62%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)16.57%32.18%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

BKR
IMO
GSPC
Loading price history…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricBKRIMO
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)35.34%30.00%
Beta (5Y)1.100.58
Max Drawdown (5Y)-46.53%-29.72%
Avg. Volume (3M)7.67M573.33K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
BKR and IMO are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricBKRIMO
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.031.05
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.041.51

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 15.06% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IMO.

BKR

Energy industry group

15.06%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
BKR
15.06%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

IMO

Energy industry group

25.24%

Max
53.85%
IMO
25.24%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 10.08% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

BKR

Energy industry group

10.08%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
BKR
10.08%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

IMO

Energy industry group

10.88%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
IMO
10.88%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 11.29% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

BKR

Energy industry group

11.29%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
BKR
11.29%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

IMO

Energy industry group

21.36%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
IMO
21.36%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricBKRIMO
ROE (TTM)15.06%25.24%
ROA (TTM)4.46%10.93%
Net Margin (TTM)10.08%10.88%
Operating Margin (TTM)11.29%21.36%
Gross Margin (TTM)23.70%20.08%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Baker Hughes (BKR) at -0.35% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at -12.75% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricBKRIMO
Revenue Growth (YoY)-0.35%-7.42%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)9.44%-7.56%
EPS Growth (YoY)-12.75%-28.24%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)---17.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.24 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

BKR

Energy industry group

1.24

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
BKR
1.24
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

IMO

Energy industry group

1.30

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
IMO
1.30
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 0.89 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

BKR

Energy industry group

0.89

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
BKR
0.89
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

IMO

Energy industry group

0.17

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
IMO
0.17
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricBKRIMO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.241.30
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.890.17
Net Debt / EBITDA2.570.13

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.99% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

BKR

Energy industry group

1.99%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
BKR
1.99%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IMO

Energy industry group

2.65%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
IMO
2.65%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 31.62% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

BKR

Energy industry group

31.62%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
BKR
31.62%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IMO

Energy industry group

26.49%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
IMO
26.49%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricBKRIMO
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.99%2.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.62%26.49%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 16.45 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

BKR

Energy industry group

16.45

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
BKR
16.45
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

IMO

Energy industry group

13.78

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
IMO
13.78
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.65 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

BKR

Energy industry group

1.65

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
BKR
1.65
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

IMO

Energy industry group

1.06

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
IMO
1.06
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Baker Hughes (BKR) at 2.36 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 carries an above-peer premium to book — IMO is pricier on assets.

BKR

Energy industry group

2.36

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
BKR
2.36
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

IMO

Energy industry group

3.38

Max
4.21
IMO
3.38
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricBKRIMO
P/E Ratio (TTM)16.4513.78
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.651.06
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.363.38
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)10.69%9.90%