BKR vs. IMO: Baker Hughes vs. Imperial Oil Stock Comparison
How do Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Baker Hughes (BKR) and Imperial Oil (IMO) both fall under the Energy industry group, but BKR is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while IMO is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
| Profile Item | BKR | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Baker Hughes Company | Imperial Oil Limited |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Integrated Oil & Gas |
| Market Capitalization | 47.54 billion USD | 58.92 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE American |
| Listing Date | April 6, 1987 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BKR | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 3.17% | 35.68% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.12% | 34.62% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.57% | 32.18% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BKR | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 35.34% | 30.00% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 0.58 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -46.53% | -29.72% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 7.67M | 573.33K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BKR | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.03 | 1.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.04 | 1.51 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 15.06% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IMO.
BKR
Energy industry group
15.06%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- BKR
- 15.06%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
IMO
Energy industry group
25.24%
- Max
- 53.85%
- IMO
- 25.24%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 10.08% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
10.08%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- BKR
- 10.08%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
IMO
Energy industry group
10.88%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- IMO
- 10.88%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 11.29% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
BKR
Energy industry group
11.29%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- BKR
- 11.29%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
IMO
Energy industry group
21.36%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- IMO
- 21.36%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BKR | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 15.06% | 25.24% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.46% | 10.93% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.08% | 10.88% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.29% | 21.36% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 23.70% | 20.08% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Baker Hughes (BKR) at -0.35% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at -12.75% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BKR | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -0.35% | -7.42% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.44% | -7.56% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -12.75% | -28.24% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -17.26% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.24 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.24
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- BKR
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
IMO
Energy industry group
1.30
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- IMO
- 1.30
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 0.89 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
BKR
Energy industry group
0.89
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- BKR
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
IMO
Energy industry group
0.17
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- IMO
- 0.17
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BKR | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.24 | 1.30 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.89 | 0.17 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.57 | 0.13 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.99% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.99%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- BKR
- 1.99%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IMO
Energy industry group
2.65%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- IMO
- 2.65%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 31.62% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
BKR
Energy industry group
31.62%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- BKR
- 31.62%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IMO
Energy industry group
26.49%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- IMO
- 26.49%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BKR | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.99% | 2.65% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.62% | 26.49% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 16.45 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
16.45
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- BKR
- 16.45
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
IMO
Energy industry group
13.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- IMO
- 13.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.65 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.65
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- BKR
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
IMO
Energy industry group
1.06
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- IMO
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Baker Hughes (BKR) at 2.36 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 carries an above-peer premium to book — IMO is pricier on assets.
BKR
Energy industry group
2.36
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- BKR
- 2.36
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
IMO
Energy industry group
3.38
- Max
- 4.21
- IMO
- 3.38
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BKR | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.45 | 13.78 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.65 | 1.06 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.36 | 3.38 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.69% | 9.90% |