Seek Returns logo

BKR vs. GLNG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BKR and GLNG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBKRGLNG
Company NameBaker Hughes CompanyGolar LNG Limited
CountryUnited StatesBermuda
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization48.15 billion USD4.00 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateApril 6, 1987July 15, 2003
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BKR and GLNG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BKR vs. GLNG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBKRGLNG
5-Day Price Return6.16%-3.65%
13-Week Price Return14.29%-2.69%
26-Week Price Return34.40%0.15%
52-Week Price Return13.23%0.57%
Month-to-Date Return0.81%-4.87%
Year-to-Date Return18.97%-7.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.07M1.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.09M1.22M
3-Month Volatility28.38%33.01%
Beta0.890.15

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BKR

16.57%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
19.11%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.55%
Min
-1.07%

BKR’s Return on Equity of 16.57% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GLNG

3.07%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

GLNG’s Return on Equity of 3.07% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

BKR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BKR

10.43%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
17.17%
Q3
9.96%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-0.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.43% places BKR in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GLNG

18.31%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

GLNG’s Net Profit Margin of 18.31% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BKR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BKR

11.57%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.93%
Median
11.31%
Q1
4.98%
Min
0.83%

BKR’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.57% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GLNG

18.40%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

GLNG’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.40% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BKR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBKRGLNG
Return on Equity (TTM)16.57%3.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.49%1.32%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.43%18.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.57%18.40%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)23.07%58.32%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BKR

1.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.08
Median
1.38
Q1
1.10
Min
0.68

BKR’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GLNG

1.32

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

GLNG’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BKR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BKR

0.33

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.10
Median
0.48
Q1
0.34
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, BKR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GLNG

1.01

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

GLNG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BKR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BKR

1.04

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
26.65
Median
7.66
Q1
2.15
Min
-17.36

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, BKR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GLNG

1.01

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, GLNG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.01 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

BKR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBKRGLNG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.411.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.001.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.331.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.041.01

Growth

Revenue Growth

BKR vs. GLNG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BKR vs. GLNG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BKR

1.85%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.36%
Q3
4.38%
Median
2.41%
Q1
0.32%
Min
0.00%

BKR’s Dividend Yield of 1.85% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GLNG

2.55%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

GLNG’s Dividend Yield of 2.55% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BKR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BKR

30.82%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
94.25%
Median
39.49%
Q1
15.00%
Min
0.00%

BKR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.82% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GLNG

173.93%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

GLNG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 173.93% is in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

BKR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBKRGLNG
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.85%2.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.82%173.93%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BKR

16.64

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
22.89
Q3
18.22
Median
13.03
Q1
11.98
Min
7.14

BKR’s P/E Ratio of 16.64 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GLNG

68.10

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

At 68.10, GLNG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BKR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BKR

1.74

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.60
Median
0.87
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

BKR’s P/S Ratio of 1.74 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GLNG

12.47

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

With a P/S Ratio of 12.47, GLNG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BKR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BKR

2.65

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.44
Q3
2.60
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.24

BKR’s P/B Ratio of 2.65 is in the upper tier for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GLNG

2.18

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

GLNG’s P/B Ratio of 2.18 is in the upper tier for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BKR vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBKRGLNG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.6468.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.7412.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.652.18
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.03147.50