BKR vs. FTI: Baker Hughes vs. TechnipFMC Stock Comparison
How do Baker Hughes (BKR) and TechnipFMC (FTI) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Baker Hughes (BKR) and TechnipFMC (FTI) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services sub-industry within the broader Energy Equipment & Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | BKR | FTI |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Baker Hughes Company | TechnipFMC plc |
| Country/Region | United States | United Kingdom |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Energy Equipment & Services |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Capitalization | 47.54 billion USD | 24.70 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | April 6, 1987 | June 15, 2001 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BKR | FTI |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 3.17% | 51.75% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.12% | 46.71% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.57% | 54.94% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BKR | FTI |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 35.34% | 32.65% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 0.87 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -46.53% | -36.71% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 7.67M | 2.86M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BKR | FTI |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.03 | 1.45 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.04 | 2.11 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
TechnipFMC (FTI) at 38.30% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 15.06% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FTI.
BKR
Energy industry group
15.06%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- BKR
- 15.06%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
FTI
Energy industry group
38.30%
- Max
- 53.85%
- FTI
- 38.30%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 10.08% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 12.04% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
10.08%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- BKR
- 10.08%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
FTI
Energy industry group
12.04%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- FTI
- 12.04%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 11.29% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 17.77% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
BKR
Energy industry group
11.29%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- BKR
- 11.29%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
FTI
Energy industry group
17.77%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- FTI
- 17.77%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BKR | FTI |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 15.06% | 38.30% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.46% | 10.08% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.08% | 12.04% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.29% | 17.77% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 23.70% | 23.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at -0.35% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 9.35% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at -12.75% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 20.42% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BKR | FTI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -0.35% | 9.35% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.44% | 14.02% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -12.75% | 20.42% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.24 and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 1.09 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.24
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- BKR
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
FTI
Energy industry group
1.09
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- FTI
- 1.09
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 0.89 and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.39 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
BKR
Energy industry group
0.89
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- BKR
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
FTI
Energy industry group
0.39
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- FTI
- 0.39
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BKR | FTI |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.24 | 1.09 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.89 | 0.39 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.57 | 0.12 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.99% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.32% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.99%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- BKR
- 1.99%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FTI
Energy industry group
0.32%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- FTI
- 0.32%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 31.62% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 6.29% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
BKR
Energy industry group
31.62%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- BKR
- 31.62%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FTI
Energy industry group
6.29%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- FTI
- 6.29%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BKR | FTI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.99% | 0.32% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.62% | 6.29% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 16.45 and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 19.97 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
16.45
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- BKR
- 16.45
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
FTI
Energy industry group
19.97
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- FTI
- 19.97
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.65 and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 2.32 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.65
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- BKR
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
FTI
Energy industry group
2.32
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- FTI
- 2.32
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Baker Hughes (BKR) at 2.36 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while TechnipFMC (FTI) at 7.44 prices above its benchmark range — FTI looks rich relative to book.
BKR
Energy industry group
2.36
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- BKR
- 2.36
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
FTI
Energy industry group
7.44
- FTI
- 7.44
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BKR | FTI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.45 | 19.97 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.65 | 2.32 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.36 | 7.44 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.69% | 6.01% |