Seek Returns logo

BKR vs. FSLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BKR and FSLR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBKRFSLR
Company NameBaker Hughes CompanyFirst Solar, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization43.80 billion USD21.39 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateApril 6, 1987November 17, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BKR and FSLR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BKR vs. FSLR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBKRFSLR
5-Day Price Return3.45%-5.46%
13-Week Price Return21.43%27.56%
26-Week Price Return-5.25%22.73%
52-Week Price Return28.34%-8.62%
Month-to-Date Return-1.38%14.14%
Year-to-Date Return8.31%13.16%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.71M4.70M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.43M4.54M
3-Month Volatility31.72%68.20%
Beta0.991.39

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BKR

17.98%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.62%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-6.65%

BKR’s Return on Equity of 17.98% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FSLR

15.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

FSLR’s Return on Equity of 15.57% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BKR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BKR

11.04%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.78%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.11%
Min
1.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.04% places BKR in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FSLR

28.95%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.95% places FSLR in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BKR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BKR

11.71%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.90%
Q3
17.97%
Median
10.83%
Q1
5.79%
Min
-5.29%

BKR’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.71% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FSLR

31.35%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.35% places FSLR in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BKR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBKRFSLR
Return on Equity (TTM)17.98%15.57%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.98%10.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.04%28.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.71%31.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)22.58%42.76%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BKR

1.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
2.12
Median
1.44
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

BKR’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FSLR

1.90

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

FSLR’s Current Ratio of 1.90 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BKR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BKR

0.34

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
0.97
Median
0.47
Q1
0.35
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, BKR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FSLR

0.12

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

FSLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BKR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BKR

1.04

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
25.59
Median
7.66
Q1
2.90
Min
-17.36

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, BKR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FSLR

39.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

FSLR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 39.40 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BKR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBKRFSLR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.411.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.001.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.340.12
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.0439.40

Growth

Revenue Growth

BKR vs. FSLR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BKR vs. FSLR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BKR

2.05%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.19%
Q1
0.38%
Min
0.00%

BKR’s Dividend Yield of 2.05% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FSLR

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FSLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BKR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BKR

28.64%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
200.86%
Q3
147.58%
Median
28.52%
Q1
15.22%
Min
0.00%

BKR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.64% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FSLR

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FSLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BKR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBKRFSLR
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.05%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.64%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BKR

13.96

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.60
Q3
21.14
Median
12.35
Q1
10.72
Min
5.76

BKR’s P/E Ratio of 13.96 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FSLR

18.13

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, FSLR’s P/E Ratio of 18.13 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

BKR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BKR

1.54

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.58
Median
0.85
Q1
0.55
Min
0.23

BKR’s P/S Ratio of 1.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FSLR

5.25

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

FSLR’s P/S Ratio of 5.25 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BKR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BKR

2.15

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.43
Median
1.82
Q1
1.18
Min
0.27

BKR’s P/B Ratio of 2.15 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FSLR

2.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

FSLR’s P/B Ratio of 2.08 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BKR vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBKRFSLR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.9618.13
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.545.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.152.08
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.6545.83