BKR vs. CVE: Baker Hughes vs. Cenovus Energy Stock Comparison
How do Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cenovus Energy (CVE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Baker Hughes (BKR) and Cenovus Energy (CVE) both fall under the Energy industry group, but BKR is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while CVE is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
| Profile Item | BKR | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Baker Hughes Company | Cenovus Energy Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Integrated Oil & Gas |
| Market Capitalization | 47.54 billion USD | 49.61 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | April 6, 1987 | November 17, 2009 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 3.17% | 60.99% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.12% | 19.41% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.57% | 18.63% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 35.34% | 37.47% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 0.43 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -46.53% | -53.51% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 7.67M | 6.90M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.03 | 1.51 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.04 | 2.20 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 15.06% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CVE.
BKR
Energy industry group
15.06%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- BKR
- 15.06%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 10.08% and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
10.08%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- BKR
- 10.08%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 11.29% and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
BKR
Energy industry group
11.29%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- BKR
- 11.29%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 15.06% | 27.44% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.46% | 12.05% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.08% | 15.42% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.29% | 26.58% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 23.70% | 33.92% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Baker Hughes (BKR) at -0.35% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at -12.75% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CVE.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -0.35% | -8.62% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.44% | -9.75% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -12.75% | 28.74% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -12.42% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.24 and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.24
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- BKR
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 0.89 and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
BKR
Energy industry group
0.89
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- BKR
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.24 | 1.64 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.89 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.57 | 0.35 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.99% and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.99%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- BKR
- 1.99%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 31.62% and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
BKR
Energy industry group
31.62%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- BKR
- 31.62%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.99% | 3.04% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.62% | 22.84% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 16.45 and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
16.45
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- BKR
- 16.45
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.65 prices around its industry’s middle — CVE costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.65
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- BKR
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 2.36 and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
2.36
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- BKR
- 2.36
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BKR | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.45 | 10.56 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.65 | 0.88 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.36 | 1.98 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.69% | 20.71% |