Seek Returns logo

BKNG vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BKNG and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBKNGUBER
Company NameBooking Holdings Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureGround Transportation
Market Capitalization176.57 billion USD189.42 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 31, 1999May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BKNG and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BKNG vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBKNGUBER
5-Day Price Return0.29%-1.99%
13-Week Price Return4.87%3.10%
26-Week Price Return13.98%29.78%
52-Week Price Return58.41%31.14%
Month-to-Date Return-1.02%3.51%
Year-to-Date Return9.65%50.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.20M21.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.23M21.23M
3-Month Volatility19.82%32.88%
Beta1.381.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BKNG

139.63%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

BKNG’s Return on Equity of 139.63% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BKNG vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BKNG

19.23%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.23% places BKNG in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BKNG vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BKNG

32.85%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.85% places BKNG in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BKNG vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBKNGUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)139.63%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.95%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.23%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.85%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)98.09%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BKNG

1.25

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

BKNG’s Current Ratio of 1.25 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BKNG vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BKNG

11.29

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 11.29, BKNG operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BKNG vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BKNG

29.94

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 29.94, BKNG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

BKNG vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBKNGUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.251.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.210.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)11.290.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)29.94-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

BKNG vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BKNG vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BKNG

0.69%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BKNG’s Dividend Yield of 0.69% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BKNG vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BKNG

25.16%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BKNG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.16% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BKNG vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBKNGUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.69%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.16%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BKNG

36.38

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

A P/E Ratio of 36.38 places BKNG in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UBER

14.99

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 14.99 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BKNG vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BKNG

7.00

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

BKNG’s P/S Ratio of 7.00 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.00

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 4.00 is in the upper echelon for the Ground Transportation industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BKNG vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BKNG

91.90

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 91.90, BKNG’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BKNG vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBKNGUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)36.3814.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.004.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)91.908.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.9522.17