Seek Returns logo

BILI vs. EA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BILI and EA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BILI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, EA is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBILIEA
Company NameBilibili Inc.Electronic Arts Inc.
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryInteractive Media & ServicesEntertainment
Market Capitalization12.07 billion USD49.87 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 28, 2018September 20, 1989
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BILI and EA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BILI vs. EA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBILIEA
5-Day Price Return-1.28%-0.49%
13-Week Price Return31.01%31.00%
26-Week Price Return49.09%38.08%
52-Week Price Return7.79%39.97%
Month-to-Date Return1.53%-0.84%
Year-to-Date Return57.48%36.71%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.51M7.38M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.20M3.34M
3-Month Volatility47.25%39.43%
Beta0.670.77

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BILI

1.56%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
33.08%
Median
10.37%
Q1
5.76%
Min
-24.17%

BILI’s Return on Equity of 1.56% is in the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

EA

15.27%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

EA’s Return on Equity of 15.27% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BILI vs. EA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BILI

0.75%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.74%
Q3
29.54%
Median
20.53%
Q1
7.52%
Min
-14.52%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, BILI’s Net Profit Margin of 0.75% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EA

13.94%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

EA’s Net Profit Margin of 13.94% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BILI vs. EA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BILI

1.05%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.82%
Median
18.53%
Q1
7.69%
Min
-18.13%

BILI’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.05% is in the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EA

19.09%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

EA’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.09% is around the midpoint for the Entertainment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BILI vs. EA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBILIEA
Return on Equity (TTM)1.56%15.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.64%8.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.75%13.94%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.05%19.09%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.91%79.14%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BILI

1.60

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.72
Median
1.85
Q1
1.20
Min
0.25

BILI’s Current Ratio of 1.60 aligns with the median group of the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EA

0.84

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

EA’s Current Ratio of 0.84 falls into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BILI vs. EA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BILI

0.69

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.85
Q3
0.49
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

BILI’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Interactive Media & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

EA

0.31

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

EA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BILI vs. EA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BILI

-1.06

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.65
Q3
16.48
Median
6.73
Q1
-0.87
Min
-3.62

BILI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.06. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

EA

190.43

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 190.43, EA demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

BILI vs. EA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBILIEA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.600.84
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.530.84
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.690.31
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-1.06190.43

Growth

Revenue Growth

BILI vs. EA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BILI vs. EA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BILI

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.07%
Q3
1.27%
Median
0.28%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BILI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EA

0.39%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EA’s Dividend Yield of 0.39% is consistent with its peers in the Entertainment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BILI vs. EA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BILI

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
101.53%
Q3
40.64%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BILI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EA

18.91%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.91% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BILI vs. EA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBILIEA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.39%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%18.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BILI

373.40

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.72
Q3
41.60
Median
25.84
Q1
18.18
Min
1.76

At 373.40, BILI’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

EA

48.04

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

EA’s P/E Ratio of 48.04 is within the middle range for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BILI vs. EA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BILI

2.80

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.76
Q3
11.40
Median
7.69
Q1
2.49
Min
0.00

BILI’s P/S Ratio of 2.80 aligns with the market consensus for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EA

6.70

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

EA’s P/S Ratio of 6.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BILI vs. EA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BILI

4.45

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
16.71
Q3
9.00
Median
3.97
Q1
2.19
Min
0.33

BILI’s P/B Ratio of 4.45 is within the conventional range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EA

6.60

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

EA’s P/B Ratio of 6.60 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BILI vs. EA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBILIEA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)373.4048.04
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.806.70
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.456.60
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--26.94