Seek Returns logo

BHP vs. CTVA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BHP and CTVA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BHP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, CTVA is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBHPCTVA
Company NameBHP Group LimitedCorteva, Inc.
CountryAustraliaUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningChemicals
Market Capitalization138.87 billion USD49.12 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980May 24, 2019
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BHP and CTVA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BHP vs. CTVA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBHPCTVA
5-Day Price Return4.67%1.80%
13-Week Price Return5.78%6.43%
26-Week Price Return3.09%15.99%
52-Week Price Return6.43%41.21%
Month-to-Date Return6.32%0.28%
Year-to-Date Return5.51%26.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.67M5.09M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.95M4.03M
3-Month Volatility23.87%15.98%
Beta0.890.80

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BHP

25.21%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, BHP’s Return on Equity of 25.21% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CTVA

5.68%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

CTVA’s Return on Equity of 5.68% is on par with the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BHP vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BHP

21.24%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.24% places BHP in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CTVA

8.16%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

CTVA’s Net Profit Margin of 8.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Chemicals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BHP vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BHP

40.78%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

An Operating Profit Margin of 40.78% places BHP in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CTVA

12.99%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

CTVA’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.99% is around the midpoint for the Chemicals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BHP vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBHPCTVA
Return on Equity (TTM)25.21%5.68%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.21%3.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.24%8.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)40.78%12.99%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--45.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BHP

1.70

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

BHP’s Current Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CTVA

1.68

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

CTVA’s Current Ratio of 1.68 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BHP vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BHP

0.44

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

BHP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.44 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CTVA

0.14

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, CTVA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BHP vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BHP

6.06

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

BHP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CTVA

4.45

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

CTVA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.45 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BHP vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBHPCTVA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.701.68
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.251.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.440.14
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.064.45

Growth

Revenue Growth

BHP vs. CTVA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BHP vs. CTVA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BHP

5.46%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.46%, BHP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CTVA

0.95%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

CTVA’s Dividend Yield of 0.95% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BHP vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BHP

65.83%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

BHP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 65.83% is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CTVA

11.80%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

CTVA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.80% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

BHP vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBHPCTVA
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.46%0.95%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)65.83%11.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BHP

12.06

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

BHP’s P/E Ratio of 12.06 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CTVA

34.96

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

A P/E Ratio of 34.96 places CTVA in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BHP vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BHP

2.56

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

BHP’s P/S Ratio of 2.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CTVA

2.85

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

CTVA’s P/S Ratio of 2.85 is in the upper echelon for the Chemicals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BHP vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BHP

2.89

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

BHP’s P/B Ratio of 2.89 is in the upper tier for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CTVA

1.96

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

CTVA’s P/B Ratio of 1.96 is within the conventional range for the Chemicals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BHP vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBHPCTVA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.0634.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.562.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.891.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.2510.16