Seek Returns logo

BHC vs. HLN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BHC and HLN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BHC is a standard domestic listing, while HLN trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolBHCHLN
Company NameBausch Health Companies Inc.Haleon plc
CountryCanadaUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorHealth CareConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryPharmaceuticalsPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization2.35 billion USD40.25 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 29, 1994July 25, 2022
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BHC and HLN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BHC vs. HLN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBHCHLN
5-Day Price Return-3.04%-0.84%
13-Week Price Return-4.79%-11.02%
26-Week Price Return2.05%-14.92%
52-Week Price Return-19.82%-12.92%
Month-to-Date Return-0.22%-0.63%
Year-to-Date Return-23.06%-12.48%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.27M16.58M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.42M14.61M
3-Month Volatility55.99%19.16%
Beta1.190.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BHC

-96.76%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.85%
Q1
5.40%
Min
-10.91%

BHC has a negative Return on Equity of -96.76%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

HLN

3.26%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
33.29%
Q3
19.04%
Median
10.69%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-10.45%

HLN’s Return on Equity of 3.26% is on par with the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BHC vs. HLN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BHC

0.99%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
40.67%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.31%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-9.91%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, BHC’s Net Profit Margin of 0.99% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

HLN

12.84%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
10.84%
Median
9.29%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-0.14%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.84% places HLN in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BHC vs. HLN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BHC

18.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.78%
Q3
23.14%
Median
16.68%
Q1
7.98%
Min
-7.13%

BHC’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.00% is around the midpoint for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HLN

19.64%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.64%
Q3
16.46%
Median
12.80%
Q1
8.01%
Min
2.98%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.64% places HLN in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BHC vs. HLN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBHCHLN
Return on Equity (TTM)-96.76%3.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.37%1.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.99%12.84%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.00%19.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.70%60.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BHC

1.31

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.65
Q3
2.64
Median
1.85
Q1
1.26
Min
0.78

BHC’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HLN

0.87

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.73
Median
1.76
Q1
1.16
Min
0.76

HLN’s Current Ratio of 0.87 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BHC vs. HLN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BHC

44.72

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.82
Median
0.35
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 44.72, BHC operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Pharmaceuticals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

HLN

0.53

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.80
Q3
0.78
Median
0.30
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

HLN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 is typical for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BHC vs. HLN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BHC

1.12

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
43.60
Median
9.83
Q1
2.37
Min
-42.71

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, BHC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.12 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

HLN

8.00

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-3.28

HLN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BHC vs. HLN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBHCHLN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.310.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.790.63
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)44.720.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.128.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

BHC vs. HLN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BHC vs. HLN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BHC

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
3.45%
Median
2.17%
Q1
0.33%
Min
0.00%

BHC currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HLN

0.72%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
2.70%
Median
1.98%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

HLN’s Dividend Yield of 0.72% is in the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BHC vs. HLN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BHC

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
199.58%
Q3
97.17%
Median
53.47%
Q1
22.97%
Min
0.00%

BHC has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HLN

954.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
221.40%
Q3
137.27%
Median
70.48%
Q1
51.10%
Min
0.00%

At 954.40%, HLN’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

BHC vs. HLN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBHCHLN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.72%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%954.40%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BHC

24.18

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.19
Q3
27.91
Median
20.59
Q1
15.08
Min
3.79

BHC’s P/E Ratio of 24.18 is within the middle range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HLN

20.40

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
31.71
Median
22.50
Q1
20.20
Min
11.79

HLN’s P/E Ratio of 20.40 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BHC vs. HLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BHC

0.24

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
8.87
Q3
4.56
Median
2.14
Q1
1.58
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, BHC’s P/S Ratio of 0.24 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

HLN

2.62

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
2.35
Median
1.92
Q1
1.18
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 2.62, HLN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Personal Care Products industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BHC vs. HLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BHC

12.57

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.99
Median
2.48
Q1
1.53
Min
0.59

At 12.57, BHC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HLN

2.11

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
12.00
Q3
6.22
Median
2.84
Q1
1.70
Min
1.12

HLN’s P/B Ratio of 2.11 is within the conventional range for the Personal Care Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BHC vs. HLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBHCHLN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.1820.40
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.242.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.572.11
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)2.1513.68