Seek Returns logo

BG vs. MO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BG and MO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBGMO
Company NameBunge Global SAAltria Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsTobacco
Market Capitalization16.65 billion USD110.03 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 2, 2001January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BG and MO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BG vs. MO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBGMO
5-Day Price Return0.59%3.07%
13-Week Price Return3.86%15.01%
26-Week Price Return20.13%24.43%
52-Week Price Return-14.14%30.19%
Month-to-Date Return4.36%5.75%
Year-to-Date Return7.05%25.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.16M7.66M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.91M8.98M
3-Month Volatility33.01%20.56%
Beta0.690.60

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BG

12.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

BG’s Return on Equity of 12.96% is on par with the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MO

149.65%

Tobacco Industry

Max
49.48%
Q3
49.48%
Median
7.92%
Q1
5.28%
Min
4.04%

MO’s Return on Equity of 149.65% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BG vs. MO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BG

2.71%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s Net Profit Margin of 2.71% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MO

37.24%

Tobacco Industry

Max
21.36%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.05%
Q1
6.80%
Min
5.37%

MO’s Net Profit Margin of 37.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

BG vs. MO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BG

3.17%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

BG’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.17% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MO

46.84%

Tobacco Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
12.68%
Median
11.00%
Q1
10.58%
Min
10.58%

MO’s Operating Profit Margin of 46.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

BG vs. MO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBGMO
Return on Equity (TTM)12.96%149.65%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.10%25.57%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.71%37.24%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.17%46.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)6.27%61.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BG

2.07

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

BG’s Current Ratio of 2.07 aligns with the median group of the Food Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MO

0.39

Tobacco Industry

Max
3.20
Q3
1.83
Median
0.83
Q1
0.72
Min
0.57

MO’s Current Ratio of 0.39 is notably low, falling beneath the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests a heightened liquidity risk and could indicate potential challenges in meeting its short-term obligations.

BG vs. MO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BG

1.04

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

BG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.04. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MO

8.67

Tobacco Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
2.19
Median
0.74
Q1
0.26
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.67, MO operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Tobacco industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

BG vs. MO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BG

3.58

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.58 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MO

36.48

Tobacco Industry

Max
36.48
Q3
28.54
Median
7.02
Q1
6.32
Min
-11.45

MO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.48 is in the upper quartile for the Tobacco industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

BG vs. MO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBGMO
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.070.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.220.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.048.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.5836.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

BG vs. MO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BG vs. MO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BG

2.23%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

BG’s Dividend Yield of 2.23% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MO

6.25%

Tobacco Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
6.06%
Median
5.48%
Q1
3.91%
Min
3.27%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.25%, MO offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Tobacco industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BG vs. MO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BG

27.00%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

BG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.00% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MO

78.29%

Tobacco Industry

Max
77.64%
Q3
76.55%
Median
50.14%
Q1
47.08%
Min
42.39%

At 78.29%, MO’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Tobacco industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

BG vs. MO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBGMO
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.23%6.25%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.00%78.29%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BG

12.09

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s P/E Ratio of 12.09 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MO

12.52

Tobacco Industry

Max
42.16
Q3
36.45
Median
20.93
Q1
10.52
Min
9.15

MO’s P/E Ratio of 12.52 is within the middle range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BG vs. MO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BG

0.33

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s P/S Ratio of 0.33 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MO

4.66

Tobacco Industry

Max
10.48
Q3
5.39
Median
3.32
Q1
1.54
Min
0.59

MO’s P/S Ratio of 4.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BG vs. MO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BG

0.99

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

BG’s P/B Ratio of 0.99 is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MO

27.09

Tobacco Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
4.76
Median
2.18
Q1
1.70
Min
1.06

At 27.09, MO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Tobacco industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BG vs. MO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBGMO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.0912.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.334.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.9927.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.2612.60