Seek Returns logo

BG vs. CL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BG and CL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBGCL
Company NameBunge Global SAColgate-Palmolive Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsHousehold Products
Market Capitalization16.65 billion USD63.86 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 2, 2001May 2, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BG and CL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BG vs. CL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBGCL
5-Day Price Return2.86%-1.47%
13-Week Price Return1.21%-12.06%
26-Week Price Return9.52%-13.14%
52-Week Price Return-16.86%-22.88%
Month-to-Date Return-3.53%-4.91%
Year-to-Date Return4.49%-12.07%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.12M6.18M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.99M5.14M
3-Month Volatility32.61%17.36%
Beta0.760.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BG

12.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

BG’s Return on Equity of 12.96% is on par with the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CL

679.67%

Household Products Industry

Max
216.14%
Q3
106.01%
Median
19.09%
Q1
9.92%
Min
-6.34%

CL’s Return on Equity of 679.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BG vs. CL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BG

2.71%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s Net Profit Margin of 2.71% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CL

14.55%

Household Products Industry

Max
14.55%
Q3
12.50%
Median
8.91%
Q1
8.67%
Min
5.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.55% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BG vs. CL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BG

3.17%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

BG’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.17% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CL

21.17%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.76%
Q3
16.17%
Median
13.11%
Q1
12.17%
Min
6.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BG vs. CL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBGCL
Return on Equity (TTM)12.96%679.67%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.10%17.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.71%14.55%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.17%21.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)6.27%60.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BG

2.07

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

BG’s Current Ratio of 2.07 aligns with the median group of the Food Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CL

0.89

Household Products Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.96
Median
1.21
Q1
0.79
Min
0.50

CL’s Current Ratio of 0.89 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BG vs. CL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BG

1.04

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

BG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.04. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CL

12.48

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.48, CL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

BG vs. CL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BG

3.58

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.58 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CL

20.49

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
17.04
Q1
9.99
Min
5.60

CL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BG vs. CL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBGCL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.070.89
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.220.57
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.0412.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.5820.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

BG vs. CL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BG vs. CL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BG

2.25%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

BG’s Dividend Yield of 2.25% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CL

2.82%

Household Products Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.95%
Median
2.83%
Q1
2.02%
Min
1.34%

CL’s Dividend Yield of 2.82% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BG vs. CL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BG

27.00%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

BG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.00% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CL

61.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
187.99%
Q3
110.64%
Median
74.63%
Q1
58.31%
Min
30.76%

CL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.95% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BG vs. CL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBGCL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.25%2.82%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.00%61.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BG

11.98

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s P/E Ratio of 11.98 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CL

21.96

Household Products Industry

Max
30.25
Q3
22.11
Median
20.35
Q1
15.19
Min
13.52

CL’s P/E Ratio of 21.96 is within the middle range for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BG vs. CL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BG

0.32

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s P/S Ratio of 0.32 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CL

3.19

Household Products Industry

Max
4.23
Q3
2.58
Median
1.98
Q1
1.29
Min
1.03

CL’s P/S Ratio of 3.19 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BG vs. CL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BG

0.99

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

BG’s P/B Ratio of 0.99 is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CL

104.94

Household Products Industry

Max
46.10
Q3
21.55
Median
5.33
Q1
2.16
Min
1.41

At 104.94, CL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BG vs. CL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBGCL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.9821.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.323.19
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.99104.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.1918.96