Seek Returns logo

BG vs. CELH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BG and CELH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBGCELH
Company NameBunge Global SACelsius Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsBeverages
Market Capitalization16.48 billion USD15.98 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqCM
Listing DateAugust 2, 2001January 22, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BG and CELH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BG vs. CELH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBGCELH
5-Day Price Return-4.05%7.85%
13-Week Price Return-2.05%53.52%
26-Week Price Return15.64%184.16%
52-Week Price Return-17.24%50.54%
Month-to-Date Return0.14%33.37%
Year-to-Date Return2.71%129.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.86M10.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.88M6.85M
3-Month Volatility31.44%51.22%
Beta0.681.40

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BG

12.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

BG’s Return on Equity of 12.96% is on par with the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CELH

9.04%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

CELH’s Return on Equity of 9.04% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BG vs. CELH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BG

2.71%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s Net Profit Margin of 2.71% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CELH

7.91%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

CELH’s Net Profit Margin of 7.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BG vs. CELH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BG

3.17%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

BG’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.17% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CELH

10.40%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

CELH’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.40% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

BG vs. CELH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBGCELH
Return on Equity (TTM)12.96%9.04%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.10%5.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.71%7.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.17%10.40%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)6.27%50.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BG

2.07

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

BG’s Current Ratio of 2.07 aligns with the median group of the Food Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CELH

2.11

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

CELH’s Current Ratio of 2.11 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

BG vs. CELH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BG

1.04

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

BG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.04. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CELH

0.42

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

CELH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BG vs. CELH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BG

3.58

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.58 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CELH

-55.00

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

CELH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -55.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

BG vs. CELH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBGCELH
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.072.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.221.70
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.040.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.58-55.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

BG vs. CELH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BG vs. CELH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BG

2.26%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

BG’s Dividend Yield of 2.26% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CELH

0.17%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BG vs. CELH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BG

27.00%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

BG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.00% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CELH

13.64%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.64% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

BG vs. CELH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBGCELH
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.26%0.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.00%13.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BG

11.96

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s P/E Ratio of 11.96 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CELH

121.52

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

At 121.52, CELH’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Beverages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BG vs. CELH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BG

0.32

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, BG’s P/S Ratio of 0.32 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CELH

9.61

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

With a P/S Ratio of 9.61, CELH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BG vs. CELH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BG

0.99

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

BG’s P/B Ratio of 0.99 is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CELH

5.72

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

CELH’s P/B Ratio of 5.72 is in the upper tier for the Beverages industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BG vs. CELH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBGCELH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.96121.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.329.61
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.995.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.1875.94