BEN vs. TW: Franklin Templeton vs. Tradeweb Markets Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Tradeweb Markets (TW) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though BEN is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while TW falls under Financial Exchanges & Data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Franklin Templeton (BEN) has an aggressive beta of 1.52, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Tradeweb Markets (TW) is defensive at 0.54 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 10.51% and Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 14.46% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 39.86% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 11.42%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 14.61% and Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 43.30% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Only one side can be read here: Tradeweb Markets (TW) reports revenue growth of 18.92%, ranked against its industry; Franklin Templeton (BEN) has no revenue growth figure this period.

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 116.48% and Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 62.23% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services and Tradeweb Markets (TW) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services and Tradeweb Markets (TW) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 4.10% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 0.42% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, BEN the richer one.

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 89.12% and Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 12.68% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 17.12 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 29.98 sits in the richer quartile — TW needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.84 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 12.10 clears its benchmark range — TW looks notably rich on sales.

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.46 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Tradeweb Markets (TW) at 4.03 carries an above-peer premium to book — TW is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics