BEN vs. OWL: Franklin Templeton vs. Blue Owl Capital Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) are both classified in the Asset Management & Custody Banks sub-industry within the broader Capital Markets industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Franklin Templeton (BEN) has more than two decades of public-market history since September 23, 1983, whereas Blue Owl Capital (OWL) listed on December 14, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 10.51% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 6.41% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 11.42% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.08% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 14.61% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 31.15% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Only one side can be read here: Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports revenue growth of 25.04%, ranked against its industry; Franklin Templeton (BEN) has no revenue growth figure this period.

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 116.48% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at -50.00% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 4.10% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 9.66% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports payout ratio above 100% at 650.00%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Franklin Templeton (BEN) reports 89.12%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 17.12 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 70.14 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for OWL’s trailing earnings.

Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.84 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 5.04 sits in the pricier quartile — OWL costs more per dollar of sales.

On P/B ratio, both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.46 and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.54 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics