BCS vs. FUTU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 19, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BCS and FUTU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both BCS and FUTU are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

Symbol	BCS	FUTU
Company Name	Barclays PLC	Futu Holdings Limited
Country	United Kingdom	Hong Kong
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Banks	Capital Markets
Market Capitalization	71.96 billion USD	24.57 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGM
Listing Date	September 9, 1986	March 8, 2019
Security Type	ADR	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BCS and FUTU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BCS vs. FUTU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BCS	FUTU
5-Day Price Return	2.49%	12.70%
13-Week Price Return	18.04%	59.36%
26-Week Price Return	21.63%	81.64%
52-Week Price Return	68.77%	199.73%
Month-to-Date Return	0.73%	14.84%
Year-to-Date Return	39.47%	120.63%
10-Day Avg. Volume	20.83M	2.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume	32.90M	2.65M
3-Month Volatility	22.39%	59.74%
Beta	1.76	0.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BCS

12.12%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

BCS’s Return on Equity of 12.12% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FUTU

23.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s Return on Equity of 23.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BCS vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BCS

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

Net Profit Margin data for BCS is currently unavailable.

FUTU

40.05%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 40.05% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BCS vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BCS

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

Operating Profit Margin data for BCS is currently unavailable.

FUTU

48.72%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 48.72% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BCS vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BCS	FUTU
Return on Equity (TTM)	12.12%	23.06%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.57%	4.34%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	--	40.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	--	48.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	82.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BCS

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FUTU

1.18

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BCS vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BCS

3.86

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

FUTU

0.36

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

BCS vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BCS

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

FUTU

4,725.16

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

BCS vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BCS	FUTU
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.18
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	3.86	0.36
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	4,725.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

BCS vs. FUTU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BCS vs. FUTU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BCS

0.00%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

BCS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

FUTU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BCS vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BCS

22.39%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

BCS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.39% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

FUTU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BCS vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BCS	FUTU
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	22.39%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BCS

5.96

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

In the lower quartile for the Banks industry, BCS’s P/E Ratio of 5.96 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FUTU

8.80

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s P/E Ratio of 8.80 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

BCS vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BCS

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

FUTU

4.24

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

FUTU’s P/S Ratio of 4.24 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BCS vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BCS

0.63

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

BCS’s P/B Ratio of 0.63 is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FUTU

2.51

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

FUTU’s P/B Ratio of 2.51 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BCS vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BCS	FUTU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	5.96	8.80
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	--	4.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	0.63	2.51
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	2.59	2.82