Seek Returns logo

BCS vs. CHYM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BCS and CHYM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BCS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, CHYM is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBCSCHYM
Company NameBarclays PLCChime Financial, Inc.
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryBanksFinancial Services
Market Capitalization71.24 billion USD9.88 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 9, 1986June 12, 2025
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BCS and CHYM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BCS vs. CHYM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBCSCHYM
5-Day Price Return-0.37%-6.60%
13-Week Price Return12.89%--
26-Week Price Return26.89%--
52-Week Price Return65.49%--
Month-to-Date Return0.22%-18.57%
Year-to-Date Return38.77%-24.49%
10-Day Avg. Volume17.66M2.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume28.22M3.88M
3-Month Volatility22.35%--
Beta1.752.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BCS

12.12%

Banks Industry

Max
26.37%
Q3
15.92%
Median
12.25%
Q1
8.69%
Min
0.15%

BCS’s Return on Equity of 12.12% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CHYM

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

Return on Equity data for CHYM is currently unavailable.

BCS vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BCS

--

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.70%
Median
28.97%
Q1
22.53%
Min
6.98%

Net Profit Margin data for BCS is currently unavailable.

CHYM

-86.97%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

CHYM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -86.97%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

BCS vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BCS

--

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.59%
Median
37.24%
Q1
28.25%
Min
13.37%

Operating Profit Margin data for BCS is currently unavailable.

CHYM

-88.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

CHYM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -88.02%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

BCS vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBCSCHYM
Return on Equity (TTM)12.12%--
Return on Assets (TTM)0.57%--
Net Profit Margin (TTM)---86.97%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)---88.02%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--87.82%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BCS

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CHYM

4.83

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BCS vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BCS

3.86

Banks Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.62
Median
1.02
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

CHYM

0.00

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

BCS vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BCS

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

CHYM

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

BCS vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBCSCHYM
Current Ratio (MRQ)--4.83
Quick Ratio (MRQ)--4.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.860.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

BCS vs. CHYM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BCS vs. CHYM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BCS

0.00%

Banks Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
5.83%
Median
3.81%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.00%

BCS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CHYM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHYM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BCS vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BCS

22.39%

Banks Industry

Max
147.07%
Q3
80.55%
Median
54.40%
Q1
35.71%
Min
0.00%

BCS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.39% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CHYM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHYM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BCS vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBCSCHYM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.39%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BCS

5.92

Banks Industry

Max
20.05
Q3
12.65
Median
10.21
Q1
7.54
Min
2.74

In the lower quartile for the Banks industry, BCS’s P/E Ratio of 5.92 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CHYM

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

P/E Ratio data for CHYM is currently unavailable.

BCS vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BCS

--

Banks Industry

Max
5.06
Q3
2.98
Median
2.24
Q1
1.59
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

CHYM

9.43

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

BCS vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BCS

0.63

Banks Industry

Max
2.18
Q3
1.36
Median
1.09
Q1
0.81
Min
0.20

BCS’s P/B Ratio of 0.63 is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CHYM

8.81

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

At 8.81, CHYM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BCS vs. CHYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBCSCHYM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)5.92--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)--9.43
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.638.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)2.58--