BBD vs. USB: Banco Bradesco vs. U.S. Bancorp Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Banco Bradesco (BBD) and U.S. Bancorp (USB) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

U.S. Bancorp (USB) trades as ordinary local shares, while Banco Bradesco (BBD) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 14.20% sits in the top ROE quartile, while U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 12.84% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for BBD.

Both Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 27.27% and U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 30.01% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Banco Bradesco (BBD) in Banks and U.S. Bancorp (USB) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 11.85% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 4.41% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 37.42% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 21.90% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for BBD.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Banco Bradesco (BBD) in Banks and U.S. Bancorp (USB) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Banco Bradesco (BBD) in Banks and U.S. Bancorp (USB) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 3.51% earns its spot in the top quartile of its industry’s yields; Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 53.03% is past the top of its own peer range — territory where a dividend-safety check matters more than the headline number.

U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 40.86% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 53.52% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 5.64 trades below its industry P/E ratio range, while U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 11.57 is closer to a normal peer multiple — a clearer earnings-valuation discount for BBD, subject to growth and earnings quality.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Banco Bradesco (BBD) in Banks and U.S. Bancorp (USB) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Banco Bradesco (BBD) at 0.69 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 1.55 is valued near its industry’s middle — BBD is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics