Seek Returns logo

BAX vs. GILD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BAX and GILD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBAXGILD
Company NameBaxter International Inc.Gilead Sciences, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesBiotechnology
Market Capitalization12.38 billion USD149.07 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 27, 1981January 22, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAX and GILD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAX vs. GILD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBAXGILD
5-Day Price Return2.42%8.94%
13-Week Price Return-24.37%15.72%
26-Week Price Return-21.75%22.54%
52-Week Price Return-34.71%64.60%
Month-to-Date Return10.80%6.99%
Year-to-Date Return-17.32%30.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume14.95M7.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.66M8.21M
3-Month Volatility53.59%34.21%
Beta0.580.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAX

-2.12%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

BAX has a negative Return on Equity of -2.12%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GILD

32.97%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
77.14%
Q3
10.76%
Median
-20.08%
Q1
-42.71%
Min
-119.20%

In the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, GILD’s Return on Equity of 32.97% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BAX vs. GILD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAX

-1.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

BAX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.42%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GILD

21.87%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
59.44%
Q3
16.21%
Median
-11.49%
Q1
-167.42%
Min
-409.07%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.87% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BAX vs. GILD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAX

-0.28%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

BAX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.28%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GILD

27.89%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.62%
Q3
20.76%
Median
-12.41%
Q1
-181.14%
Min
-482.02%

An Operating Profit Margin of 27.89% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BAX vs. GILD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBAXGILD
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.12%32.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.65%11.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-1.42%21.87%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.28%27.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.01%78.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAX

2.30

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

BAX’s Current Ratio of 2.30 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GILD

1.32

Biotechnology Industry

Max
19.31
Q3
9.38
Median
4.54
Q1
2.45
Min
0.76

GILD’s Current Ratio of 1.32 falls into the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BAX vs. GILD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAX

1.30

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

BAX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.30. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GILD

1.27

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.64
Median
0.09
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

GILD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Biotechnology industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.27. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BAX vs. GILD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAX

0.20

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

BAX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.20 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

GILD

1.71

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.91
Median
-7.81
Q1
-63.90
Min
-153.80

GILD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Biotechnology industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BAX vs. GILD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBAXGILD
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.301.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.200.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.301.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.201.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAX vs. GILD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAX vs. GILD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAX

3.79%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.79%, BAX offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GILD

3.97%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GILD’s Dividend Yield of 3.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

BAX vs. GILD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAX

90.20%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BAX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 90.20% is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

GILD

117.08%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 117.08%, GILD’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

BAX vs. GILD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBAXGILD
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.79%3.97%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)90.20%117.08%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAX

--

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

P/E Ratio data for BAX is currently unavailable.

GILD

23.61

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.14
Q3
38.17
Median
29.01
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

GILD’s P/E Ratio of 23.61 is within the middle range for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BAX vs. GILD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAX

1.14

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, BAX’s P/S Ratio of 1.14 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

GILD

5.16

Biotechnology Industry

Max
76.98
Q3
36.53
Median
9.49
Q1
4.49
Min
0.00

GILD’s P/S Ratio of 5.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BAX vs. GILD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAX

2.12

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

BAX’s P/B Ratio of 2.12 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

GILD

7.01

Biotechnology Industry

Max
20.53
Q3
9.76
Median
4.77
Q1
2.49
Min
0.59

GILD’s P/B Ratio of 7.01 is within the conventional range for the Biotechnology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BAX vs. GILD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBAXGILD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--23.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.145.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.127.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.6516.31