BAP vs. RKT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 17, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BAP and RKT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	BAP	RKT
Company Name	Credicorp Ltd.	Rocket Companies, Inc.
Country	Peru	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Banks	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	20.99 billion USD	34.24 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	October 25, 1995	August 6, 2020
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAP and RKT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAP vs. RKT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BAP	RKT
5-Day Price Return	2.09%	-11.70%
13-Week Price Return	17.75%	16.27%
26-Week Price Return	39.78%	17.11%
52-Week Price Return	44.96%	-7.37%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.67%	-16.31%
Year-to-Date Return	44.28%	44.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.29M	62.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.34M	24.82M
3-Month Volatility	20.70%	62.51%
Beta	0.88	2.33

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAP

18.10%

Banks Industry

Max: 25.40%
Q3: 15.55%
Median: 12.00%
Q1: 8.98%
Min: -0.10%

In the upper quartile for the Banks industry, BAP’s Return on Equity of 18.10% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 39.28%
Q3: 18.88%
Median: 9.97%
Q1: 4.03%
Min: -10.25%

RKT has a negative Return on Equity of -0.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

BAP vs. RKT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAP

26.21%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.73%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.56%
Min: 6.98%

BAP’s Net Profit Margin of 26.21% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.35%
Median: 12.68%
Q1: 6.11%
Min: -11.69%

RKT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.01%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

BAP vs. RKT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAP

35.93%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.73%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 12.28%

BAP’s Operating Profit Margin of 35.93% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RKT

13.77%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 75.57%
Q3: 37.78%
Median: 19.09%
Q1: 10.04%
Min: -19.42%

RKT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.77% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BAP vs. RKT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BAP	RKT
Return on Equity (TTM)	18.10%	-0.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.48%	0.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	26.21%	-0.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	35.93%	13.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAP

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

RKT

0.40

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.83
Q3: 2.70
Median: 1.44
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BAP vs. RKT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAP

1.00

Banks Industry

Max: 5.78
Q3: 2.66
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.40
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

RKT

2.69

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

BAP vs. RKT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAP

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

RKT

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

BAP vs. RKT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BAP	RKT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	0.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	0.40
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.00	2.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	2.42

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAP vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAP vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAP

5.77%

Banks Industry

Max: 11.03%
Q3: 6.00%
Median: 3.87%
Q1: 2.41%
Min: 0.00%

BAP’s Dividend Yield of 5.77% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.12%
Q3: 3.37%
Median: 1.70%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RKT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BAP vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAP

88.16%

Banks Industry

Max: 134.24%
Q3: 79.39%
Median: 55.09%
Q1: 36.09%
Min: 0.00%

BAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 88.16% is in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 18.23%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RKT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BAP vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BAP	RKT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	5.77%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	88.16%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAP

11.54

Banks Industry

Max: 22.69
Q3: 13.75
Median: 10.32
Q1: 7.73
Min: 2.59

BAP’s P/E Ratio of 11.54 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RKT

Financial Services Industry

Max: 45.81
Q3: 30.21
Median: 16.29
Q1: 10.14
Min: 0.70

P/E Ratio data for RKT is currently unavailable.

BAP vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAP

1.92

Banks Industry

Max: 4.90
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

RKT

8.86

Financial Services Industry

Max: 10.88
Q3: 5.34
Median: 2.64
Q1: 1.24
Min: 0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

BAP vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAP

1.77

Banks Industry

Max: 2.09
Q3: 1.40
Median: 1.11
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.29

BAP’s P/B Ratio of 1.77 is in the upper tier for the Banks industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

RKT

3.81

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.93
Q3: 3.78
Median: 1.49
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

RKT’s P/B Ratio of 3.81 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BAP vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BAP	RKT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	11.54	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.92	8.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.77	3.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	3.59	25.03