Seek Returns logo

BAP vs. ITUB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BAP and ITUB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BAP is a standard domestic listing, while ITUB trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolBAPITUB
Company NameCredicorp Ltd.Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A.
CountryPeruBrazil
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryBanksBanks
Market Capitalization20.02 billion USD81.63 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 25, 1995February 25, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAP and ITUB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAP vs. ITUB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBAPITUB
5-Day Price Return-2.01%0.40%
13-Week Price Return0.76%7.52%
26-Week Price Return22.92%7.12%
52-Week Price Return35.71%28.68%
Month-to-Date Return-2.76%2.94%
Year-to-Date Return38.45%45.31%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.23M24.44M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.32M20.13M
3-Month Volatility21.96%18.28%
Beta0.871.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAP

18.10%

Banks Industry

Max
25.75%
Q3
15.51%
Median
11.91%
Q1
8.65%
Min
-1.41%

In the upper quartile for the Banks industry, BAP’s Return on Equity of 18.10% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ITUB

20.76%

Banks Industry

Max
25.75%
Q3
15.51%
Median
11.91%
Q1
8.65%
Min
-1.41%

In the upper quartile for the Banks industry, ITUB’s Return on Equity of 20.76% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BAP vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAP

26.21%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.60%
Median
28.95%
Q1
22.27%
Min
2.66%

BAP’s Net Profit Margin of 26.21% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ITUB

17.96%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.60%
Median
28.95%
Q1
22.27%
Min
2.66%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, ITUB’s Net Profit Margin of 17.96% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BAP vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAP

35.93%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.30%
Median
37.14%
Q1
28.21%
Min
12.28%

BAP’s Operating Profit Margin of 35.93% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ITUB

21.93%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.30%
Median
37.14%
Q1
28.21%
Min
12.28%

ITUB’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.93% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

BAP vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBAPITUB
Return on Equity (TTM)18.10%20.76%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.48%1.50%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.21%17.96%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)35.93%21.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)----

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAP

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ITUB

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BAP vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAP

1.00

Banks Industry

Max
5.78
Q3
2.55
Median
0.94
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

ITUB

4.49

Banks Industry

Max
5.78
Q3
2.55
Median
0.94
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

BAP vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAP

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

ITUB

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

BAP vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBAPITUB
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Quick Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.004.49
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAP vs. ITUB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAP vs. ITUB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAP

6.12%

Banks Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.44%
Median
3.78%
Q1
2.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.12%, BAP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Banks industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ITUB

6.30%

Banks Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.44%
Median
3.78%
Q1
2.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.30%, ITUB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Banks industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BAP vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAP

88.16%

Banks Industry

Max
135.42%
Q3
78.13%
Median
52.54%
Q1
35.48%
Min
0.00%

BAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 88.16% is in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ITUB

51.88%

Banks Industry

Max
135.42%
Q3
78.13%
Median
52.54%
Q1
35.48%
Min
0.00%

ITUB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 51.88% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BAP vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBAPITUB
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.12%6.30%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)88.16%51.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAP

10.89

Banks Industry

Max
21.36
Q3
13.70
Median
10.55
Q1
8.08
Min
2.84

BAP’s P/E Ratio of 10.89 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ITUB

10.01

Banks Industry

Max
21.36
Q3
13.70
Median
10.55
Q1
8.08
Min
2.84

ITUB’s P/E Ratio of 10.01 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BAP vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAP

1.92

Banks Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.97
Median
2.24
Q1
1.58
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

ITUB

1.38

Banks Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.97
Median
2.24
Q1
1.58
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

BAP vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAP

1.74

Banks Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.43
Median
1.13
Q1
0.87
Min
0.25

BAP’s P/B Ratio of 1.74 is in the upper tier for the Banks industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ITUB

1.81

Banks Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.43
Median
1.13
Q1
0.87
Min
0.25

ITUB’s P/B Ratio of 1.81 is in the upper tier for the Banks industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BAP vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBAPITUB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.8910.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.921.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.741.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)3.3930.09