BAP vs. ICE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BAP and ICE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	BAP	ICE
Company Name	Credicorp Ltd.	Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
Country	Peru	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Banks	Capital Markets
Market Capitalization	20.02 billion USD	86.17 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	October 25, 1995	November 16, 2005
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAP and ICE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAP vs. ICE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BAP	ICE
5-Day Price Return	-2.01%	1.72%
13-Week Price Return	0.76%	-16.08%
26-Week Price Return	22.92%	-12.02%
52-Week Price Return	35.71%	-2.42%
Month-to-Date Return	-2.76%	3.95%
Year-to-Date Return	38.45%	2.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.23M	3.37M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.32M	3.32M
3-Month Volatility	21.96%	18.79%
Beta	0.87	1.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAP

18.10%

Banks Industry

Max: 25.75%
Q3: 15.51%
Median: 11.91%
Q1: 8.65%
Min: -1.41%

In the upper quartile for the Banks industry, BAP’s Return on Equity of 18.10% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ICE

11.22%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 41.61%
Q3: 22.56%
Median: 13.62%
Q1: 9.23%
Min: -4.25%

ICE’s Return on Equity of 11.22% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BAP vs. ICE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAP

26.21%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.60%
Median: 28.95%
Q1: 22.27%
Min: 2.66%

BAP’s Net Profit Margin of 26.21% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ICE

25.24%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 69.91%
Q3: 36.88%
Median: 24.30%
Q1: 13.14%
Min: -6.20%

ICE’s Net Profit Margin of 25.24% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BAP vs. ICE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAP

35.93%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.30%
Median: 37.14%
Q1: 28.21%
Min: 12.28%

BAP’s Operating Profit Margin of 35.93% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ICE

38.07%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 83.68%
Q3: 47.64%
Median: 32.36%
Q1: 19.28%
Min: 0.30%

ICE’s Operating Profit Margin of 38.07% is around the midpoint for the Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BAP vs. ICE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BAP	ICE
Return on Equity (TTM)	18.10%	11.22%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.48%	2.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	26.21%	25.24%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	35.93%	38.07%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	77.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAP

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ICE

1.01

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.43
Q3: 1.76
Median: 1.00
Q1: 0.60
Min: 0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BAP vs. ICE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAP

1.00

Banks Industry

Max: 5.78
Q3: 2.55
Median: 0.94
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

ICE

0.66

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.12
Q3: 2.78
Median: 0.96
Q1: 0.31
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

BAP vs. ICE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAP

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

ICE

5.28

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 107.59
Q3: 50.42
Median: 10.94
Q1: 4.37
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

BAP vs. ICE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BAP	ICE
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.01
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.00
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.00	0.66
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	5.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAP vs. ICE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAP vs. ICE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAP

6.12%

Banks Industry

Max: 9.92%
Q3: 5.44%
Median: 3.78%
Q1: 2.38%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.12%, BAP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Banks industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ICE

1.26%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 8.63%
Q3: 4.88%
Median: 2.72%
Q1: 1.41%
Min: 0.00%

ICE’s Dividend Yield of 1.26% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BAP vs. ICE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAP

88.16%

Banks Industry

Max: 135.42%
Q3: 78.13%
Median: 52.54%
Q1: 35.48%
Min: 0.00%

BAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 88.16% is in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ICE

34.47%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 188.84%
Q3: 96.52%
Median: 61.58%
Q1: 31.74%
Min: 0.00%

ICE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 34.47% is within the typical range for the Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BAP vs. ICE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BAP	ICE
Dividend Yield (TTM)	6.12%	1.26%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	88.16%	34.47%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAP

10.89

Banks Industry

Max: 21.36
Q3: 13.70
Median: 10.55
Q1: 8.08
Min: 2.84

BAP’s P/E Ratio of 10.89 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ICE

27.42

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 47.53
Q3: 28.81
Median: 16.62
Q1: 12.06
Min: 5.71

ICE’s P/E Ratio of 27.42 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BAP vs. ICE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAP

1.92

Banks Industry

Max: 4.90
Q3: 2.97
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.58
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

ICE

6.92

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 13.23
Q3: 6.65
Median: 4.40
Q1: 2.22
Min: 0.03

ICE’s P/S Ratio of 6.92 is in the upper echelon for the Capital Markets industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BAP vs. ICE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAP

1.74

Banks Industry

Max: 2.14
Q3: 1.43
Median: 1.13
Q1: 0.87
Min: 0.25

BAP’s P/B Ratio of 1.74 is in the upper tier for the Banks industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ICE

3.37

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.83
Q3: 5.27
Median: 2.66
Q1: 1.34
Min: 0.37

ICE’s P/B Ratio of 3.37 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BAP vs. ICE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BAP	ICE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	10.89	27.42
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.92	6.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.74	3.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	3.39	21.19