BAP vs. FUTU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 19, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BAP and FUTU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BAP is a standard domestic listing, while FUTU trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	BAP	FUTU
Company Name	Credicorp Ltd.	Futu Holdings Limited
Country	Peru	Hong Kong
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Banks	Capital Markets
Market Capitalization	19.79 billion USD	24.57 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGM
Listing Date	October 25, 1995	March 8, 2019
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAP and FUTU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAP vs. FUTU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BAP	FUTU
5-Day Price Return	1.37%	12.70%
13-Week Price Return	22.69%	59.36%
26-Week Price Return	29.27%	81.64%
52-Week Price Return	51.67%	199.73%
Month-to-Date Return	5.22%	14.84%
Year-to-Date Return	36.03%	120.63%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.34M	2.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.33M	2.65M
3-Month Volatility	21.29%	59.74%
Beta	1.09	0.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAP

16.95%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

In the upper quartile for the Banks industry, BAP’s Return on Equity of 16.95% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FUTU

23.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s Return on Equity of 23.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BAP vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAP

26.21%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

BAP’s Net Profit Margin of 26.21% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FUTU

40.05%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 40.05% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BAP vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAP

35.93%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

BAP’s Operating Profit Margin of 35.93% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FUTU

48.72%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 48.72% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BAP vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BAP	FUTU
Return on Equity (TTM)	16.95%	23.06%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.29%	4.34%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	26.21%	40.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	35.93%	48.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	82.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAP

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FUTU

1.18

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BAP vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAP

0.99

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

FUTU

0.36

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

BAP vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAP

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

FUTU

4,725.16

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

BAP vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BAP	FUTU
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.18
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.99	0.36
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	4,725.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAP vs. FUTU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAP vs. FUTU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAP

5.36%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

BAP’s Dividend Yield of 5.36% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

FUTU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BAP vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAP

88.93%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

BAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 88.93% is in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

FUTU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BAP vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BAP	FUTU
Dividend Yield (TTM)	5.36%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	88.93%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAP

12.20

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

BAP’s P/E Ratio of 12.20 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FUTU

8.80

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s P/E Ratio of 8.80 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

BAP vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAP

1.92

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

FUTU

4.24

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

FUTU’s P/S Ratio of 4.24 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BAP vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAP

1.45

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

BAP’s P/B Ratio of 1.45 is in the upper tier for the Banks industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FUTU

2.51

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

FUTU’s P/B Ratio of 2.51 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BAP vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BAP	FUTU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	12.20	8.80
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.92	4.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.45	2.51
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	5.01	2.82