BAM vs. FUTU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 21, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BAM and FUTU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BAM is a standard domestic listing, while FUTU trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	BAM	FUTU
Company Name	Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.	Futu Holdings Limited
Country	United States	Hong Kong
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Capital Markets	Capital Markets
Market Capitalization	100.87 billion USD	24.57 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGM
Listing Date	December 1, 2022	March 8, 2019
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAM and FUTU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAM vs. FUTU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BAM	FUTU
5-Day Price Return	2.61%	12.70%
13-Week Price Return	8.77%	59.36%
26-Week Price Return	7.98%	81.64%
52-Week Price Return	59.79%	199.73%
Month-to-Date Return	1.36%	14.84%
Year-to-Date Return	15.35%	120.63%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.06M	2.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.36M	2.65M
3-Month Volatility	26.66%	59.74%
Beta	1.91	0.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAM

20.67%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

BAM’s Return on Equity of 20.67% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FUTU

23.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s Return on Equity of 23.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BAM vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAM

57.13%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 57.13% places BAM in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FUTU

40.05%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 40.05% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BAM vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAM

51.12%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 51.12% places BAM in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FUTU

48.72%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 48.72% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BAM vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BAM	FUTU
Return on Equity (TTM)	20.67%	23.06%
Return on Assets (TTM)	14.12%	4.34%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	57.13%	40.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	51.12%	48.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	82.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAM

1.31

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FUTU

1.18

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BAM vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAM

0.22

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

FUTU

0.36

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

BAM vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAM

20.09

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

FUTU

4,725.16

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

BAM vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BAM	FUTU
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.31	1.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.31	1.18
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.22	0.36
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	20.09	4,725.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAM vs. FUTU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAM vs. FUTU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAM

1.71%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

BAM’s Dividend Yield of 1.71% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

FUTU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BAM vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAM

122.97%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

BAM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 122.97% is in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

FUTU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BAM vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BAM	FUTU
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.71%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	122.97%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAM

71.72

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

At 71.72, BAM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FUTU

8.80

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s P/E Ratio of 8.80 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

BAM vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAM

40.97

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 40.97, BAM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Capital Markets industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FUTU

4.24

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

FUTU’s P/S Ratio of 4.24 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BAM vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAM

8.76

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

BAM’s P/B Ratio of 8.76 is in the upper tier for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FUTU

2.51

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

FUTU’s P/B Ratio of 2.51 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BAM vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Capital Markets industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BAM	FUTU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	71.72	8.80
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	40.97	4.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	8.76	2.51
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	104.60	2.82