Seek Returns logo

BAM vs. BN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BAM and BN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

BAM’s market capitalization stands at 93.06 billion USD, while BN’s is 105.50 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 1.87 for BAM and 2.19 for BN, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolBAMBN
Company NameBrookfield Asset Management Ltd.Brookfield Corporation
CountryCACA
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset Management
CEOJames Bruce FlattJames Bruce Flatt
Price57.71 USD64.02 USD
Market Cap93.06 billion USD105.50 billion USD
Beta1.872.19
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateDecember 1, 2022December 30, 1983
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAM and BN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAM vs. BN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

BAM

22.44%

Asset Management Industry

Max
34.25%
Q3
18.22%
Median
11.24%
Q1
5.81%
Min
-5.72%

In the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry, BAM’s Return on Equity of 22.44% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BN

1.34%

Asset Management Industry

Max
34.25%
Q3
18.22%
Median
11.24%
Q1
5.81%
Min
-5.72%

BN’s Return on Equity of 1.34% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their ROE against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

BAM

6.62%

Asset Management Industry

Max
42.18%
Q3
20.06%
Median
8.68%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-16.42%

BAM’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.62% is in line with the norm for the Asset Management industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

BN

1.44%

Asset Management Industry

Max
42.18%
Q3
20.06%
Median
8.68%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-16.42%

BN’s Return on Invested Capital of 1.44% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This indicates a less efficient conversion of invested capital into profit compared to most of its competitors.

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their ROIC against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

BAM

65.26%

Asset Management Industry

Max
91.66%
Q3
57.81%
Median
29.48%
Q1
15.70%
Min
-27.65%

A Net Profit Margin of 65.26% places BAM in the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BN

0.75%

Asset Management Industry

Max
91.66%
Q3
57.81%
Median
29.48%
Q1
15.70%
Min
-27.65%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry, BN’s Net Profit Margin of 0.75% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

BAM

54.57%

Asset Management Industry

Max
99.76%
Q3
78.28%
Median
34.76%
Q1
21.75%
Min
-48.25%

BAM’s Operating Profit Margin of 54.57% is around the midpoint for the Asset Management industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BN

22.92%

Asset Management Industry

Max
99.76%
Q3
78.28%
Median
34.76%
Q1
21.75%
Min
-48.25%

BN’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.92% is around the midpoint for the Asset Management industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBAMBN
Return on Equity (TTM)22.44%1.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.82%0.12%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)6.62%1.44%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)65.26%0.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)54.57%22.92%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.27%26.32%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

BAM

1.68

Asset Management Industry

Max
12.44
Q3
5.76
Median
3.04
Q1
1.03
Min
0.01

BAM’s Current Ratio of 1.68 aligns with the median group of the Asset Management industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BN

1.11

Asset Management Industry

Max
12.44
Q3
5.76
Median
3.04
Q1
1.03
Min
0.01

BN’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Asset Management industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

BAM

0.08

Asset Management Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.42
Median
0.76
Q1
0.34
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry, BAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BN

5.43

Asset Management Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.42
Median
0.76
Q1
0.34
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.43, BN operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Asset Management industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

BAM

2.89

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.30
Q3
6.30
Median
2.71
Q1
1.00
Min
-6.91

BAM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.89 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Asset Management industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BN

1.10

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.30
Q3
6.30
Median
2.71
Q1
1.00
Min
-6.91

BN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.10 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Asset Management industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBAMBN
Current Ratio (TTM)1.681.11
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.680.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.085.43
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.040.50
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.217.86
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.891.10

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for BAM and BN. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

BAM

3.49%

Asset Management Industry

Max
26.09%
Q3
11.60%
Median
6.37%
Q1
2.75%
Min
0.00%

BAM’s Dividend Yield of 3.49% is consistent with its peers in the Asset Management industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BN

0.66%

Asset Management Industry

Max
26.09%
Q3
11.60%
Median
6.37%
Q1
2.75%
Min
0.00%

BN’s Dividend Yield of 0.66% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

BAM

35.41%

Asset Management Industry

Max
1,034.88%
Q3
127.70%
Median
75.15%
Q1
34.21%
Min
0.00%

BAM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.41% is within the typical range for the Asset Management industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BN

108.21%

Asset Management Industry

Max
1,034.88%
Q3
127.70%
Median
75.15%
Q1
34.21%
Min
0.00%

BN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 108.21% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBAMBN
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.49%0.66%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.41%108.21%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

BAM

91.29

Asset Management Industry

Max
38.72
Q3
23.40
Median
11.45
Q1
8.80
Min
1.54

At 91.29, BAM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BN

157.33

Asset Management Industry

Max
38.72
Q3
23.40
Median
11.45
Q1
8.80
Min
1.54

At 157.33, BN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

BAM

5.60

Asset Management Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.23
Median
1.55
Q1
0.89
Min
0.02

A Forward PEG Ratio of 5.60 places BAM in the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

BN

8.25

Asset Management Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.23
Median
1.55
Q1
0.89
Min
0.02

BN’s Forward PEG Ratio of 8.25 is exceptionally high for the Asset Management industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

BAM

59.54

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
7.92
Median
4.87
Q1
3.51
Min
0.02

With a P/S Ratio of 59.54, BAM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Asset Management industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BN

1.30

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
7.92
Median
4.87
Q1
3.51
Min
0.02

In the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry, BN’s P/S Ratio of 1.30 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

BAM

10.97

Asset Management Industry

Max
5.33
Q3
2.75
Median
1.06
Q1
0.87
Min
0.00

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management industry.

BN

2.13

Asset Management Industry

Max
5.33
Q3
2.75
Median
1.06
Q1
0.87
Min
0.00

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management industry.

BAM vs. BN: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBAMBN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)91.29157.33
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)5.608.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)59.541.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)10.972.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-226.91-29.38
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)65.3411.41
EV-to-Sales (TTM)59.744.17