BAM vs. BCH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 19, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BAM and BCH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BAM is a standard domestic listing, while BCH trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	BAM	BCH
Company Name	Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.	Banco de Chile
Country	United States	Chile
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Capital Markets	Banks
Market Capitalization	100.87 billion USD	14.97 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	December 1, 2022	August 2, 2002
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAM and BCH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAM vs. BCH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BAM	BCH
5-Day Price Return	2.61%	2.73%
13-Week Price Return	8.77%	-2.28%
26-Week Price Return	7.98%	13.14%
52-Week Price Return	59.79%	26.67%
Month-to-Date Return	1.36%	3.90%
Year-to-Date Return	15.35%	23.13%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.06M	79.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.36M	103.96M
3-Month Volatility	26.66%	16.92%
Beta	1.91	0.88

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAM

20.67%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

BAM’s Return on Equity of 20.67% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BCH

22.69%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

In the upper quartile for the Banks industry, BCH’s Return on Equity of 22.69% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BAM vs. BCH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAM

57.13%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 57.13% places BAM in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BCH

34.28%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

BCH’s Net Profit Margin of 34.28% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BAM vs. BCH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAM

51.12%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 51.12% places BAM in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BCH

43.16%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

BCH’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.16% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BAM vs. BCH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BAM	BCH
Return on Equity (TTM)	20.67%	22.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)	14.12%	2.35%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	57.13%	34.28%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	51.12%	43.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAM

1.31

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BCH

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BAM vs. BCH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAM

0.22

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

BCH

2.40

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

BAM vs. BCH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAM

20.09

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

BCH

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

BAM vs. BCH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BAM	BCH
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.31	--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.31	--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.22	2.40
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	20.09	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAM vs. BCH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAM vs. BCH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAM

1.71%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

BAM’s Dividend Yield of 1.71% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BCH

7.08%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 7.08%, BCH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Banks industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BAM vs. BCH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAM

122.97%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

BAM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 122.97% is in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

BCH

302.60%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

At 302.60%, BCH’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Banks industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

BAM vs. BCH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BAM	BCH
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.71%	7.08%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	122.97%	302.60%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAM

71.72

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

At 71.72, BAM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BCH

11.35

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

BCH’s P/E Ratio of 11.35 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BAM vs. BCH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAM

40.97

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 40.97, BAM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Capital Markets industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BCH

2.76

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

BAM vs. BCH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAM

8.76

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

BAM’s P/B Ratio of 8.76 is in the upper tier for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BCH

2.34

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

At 2.34, BCH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Banks industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BAM vs. BCH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BAM	BCH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	71.72	11.35
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	40.97	2.76
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	8.76	2.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	104.60	6.07