Seek Returns logo

BALL vs. STLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BALL and STLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBALLSTLA
Company NameBall CorporationStellantis N.V.
CountryUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingAutomobiles
Market Capitalization12.99 billion USD29.45 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973June 9, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BALL and STLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BALL vs. STLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBALLSTLA
5-Day Price Return2.56%-5.39%
13-Week Price Return-11.61%2.33%
26-Week Price Return-9.83%-8.23%
52-Week Price Return-23.82%-30.85%
Month-to-Date Return1.28%0.07%
Year-to-Date Return-13.66%-30.23%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.84M19.50M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.58M26.44M
3-Month Volatility22.64%47.63%
Beta1.141.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BALL

12.36%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
33.32%
Q3
19.47%
Median
12.36%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-12.20%

BALL’s Return on Equity of 12.36% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

STLA

-3.09%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.92%
Median
5.04%
Q1
-1.15%
Min
-15.36%

STLA has a negative Return on Equity of -3.09%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

BALL vs. STLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BALL

5.36%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.45%
Q3
8.67%
Median
5.36%
Q1
3.40%
Min
-2.25%

BALL’s Net Profit Margin of 5.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

STLA

-1.64%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.74%
Q3
5.64%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-0.52%
Min
-6.61%

STLA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.64%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

BALL vs. STLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BALL

9.19%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
12.87%
Median
9.18%
Q1
6.39%
Min
-0.41%

BALL’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.19% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

STLA

-3.88%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
4.62%
Q1
-0.45%
Min
-6.16%

STLA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.88%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

BALL vs. STLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBALLSTLA
Return on Equity (TTM)12.36%-3.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.73%-1.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.36%-1.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.19%-3.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.86%7.74%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BALL

1.11

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.55
Median
1.33
Q1
1.14
Min
0.87

BALL’s Current Ratio of 1.11 falls into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

STLA

1.06

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.58
Median
1.28
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

STLA’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BALL vs. STLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BALL

1.32

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
3.86
Q3
1.96
Median
1.25
Q1
0.67
Min
0.23

BALL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.32 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

STLA

0.56

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.15
Median
0.60
Q1
0.28
Min
0.05

STLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BALL vs. STLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BALL

3.38

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

BALL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.38 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

STLA

37.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
35.88
Median
13.88
Q1
3.52
Min
-19.31

STLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 37.73 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

BALL vs. STLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBALLSTLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.111.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.720.75
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.320.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.3837.73

Growth

Revenue Growth

BALL vs. STLA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BALL vs. STLA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BALL

1.76%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.42%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

BALL’s Dividend Yield of 1.76% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

STLA

5.81%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.18%
Q3
4.88%
Median
2.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.81%, STLA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobiles industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BALL vs. STLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BALL

23.31%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
63.96%
Q1
27.01%
Min
0.00%

BALL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 23.31% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

STLA

82.70%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
60.59%
Median
39.48%
Q1
20.22%
Min
0.00%

STLA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 82.70% is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

BALL vs. STLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBALLSTLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.76%5.81%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)23.31%82.70%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BALL

18.85

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
19.86
Q3
18.86
Median
16.72
Q1
13.58
Min
6.36

BALL’s P/E Ratio of 18.85 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

STLA

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.96
Q3
22.07
Median
11.17
Q1
8.41
Min
5.02

P/E Ratio data for STLA is currently unavailable.

BALL vs. STLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BALL

1.01

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.14
Median
0.89
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

BALL’s P/S Ratio of 1.01 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

STLA

0.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.29
Q3
0.84
Median
0.51
Q1
0.27
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, STLA’s P/S Ratio of 0.23 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

BALL vs. STLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BALL

2.52

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
2.85
Median
2.17
Q1
1.46
Min
0.76

BALL’s P/B Ratio of 2.52 is within the conventional range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

STLA

0.34

Automobiles Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
1.96
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.18

STLA’s P/B Ratio of 0.34 is in the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

BALL vs. STLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBALLSTLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.85--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.010.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.520.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.472.78