Seek Returns logo

BALL vs. RIVN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BALL and RIVN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBALLRIVN
Company NameBall CorporationRivian Automotive, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingAutomobiles
Market Capitalization14.43 billion USD15.91 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973November 10, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BALL and RIVN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BALL vs. RIVN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBALLRIVN
5-Day Price Return-0.24%7.02%
13-Week Price Return-0.58%-17.60%
26-Week Price Return8.10%-5.89%
52-Week Price Return-16.91%2.34%
Month-to-Date Return-7.42%1.86%
Year-to-Date Return-3.85%-1.43%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.26M43.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.55M34.04M
3-Month Volatility25.28%39.99%
Beta1.111.84

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BALL

9.56%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

BALL’s Return on Equity of 9.56% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RIVN

-56.67%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

RIVN has a negative Return on Equity of -56.67%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

BALL vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BALL

4.48%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

BALL’s Net Profit Margin of 4.48% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RIVN

-68.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

RIVN has a negative Net Profit Margin of -68.06%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

BALL vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BALL

7.89%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

BALL’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.89% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RIVN

-72.04%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

RIVN has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.04%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

BALL vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBALLRIVN
Return on Equity (TTM)9.56%-56.67%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.04%-23.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.48%-68.06%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.89%-72.04%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.17%-4.91%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BALL

1.00

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

BALL’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RIVN

3.44

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

RIVN’s Current Ratio of 3.44 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

BALL vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BALL

1.35

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

BALL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.35 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RIVN

0.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

RIVN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.73 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BALL vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BALL

3.38

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

BALL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.38 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RIVN

-179.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

RIVN has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -179.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

BALL vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBALLRIVN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.003.44
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.672.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.350.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.38-179.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

BALL vs. RIVN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BALL vs. RIVN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BALL

1.60%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

BALL’s Dividend Yield of 1.60% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

RIVN

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RIVN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BALL vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BALL

29.25%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

BALL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.25% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RIVN

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

RIVN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BALL vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBALLRIVN
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.60%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.25%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BALL

25.96

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

BALL’s P/E Ratio of 25.96 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RIVN

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

P/E Ratio data for RIVN is currently unavailable.

BALL vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BALL

1.16

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

BALL’s P/S Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RIVN

2.84

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 2.84, RIVN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BALL vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BALL

2.99

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

BALL’s P/B Ratio of 2.99 is within the conventional range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RIVN

2.71

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

RIVN’s P/B Ratio of 2.71 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BALL vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBALLRIVN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.96--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.162.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.992.71
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.87--