BALL vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at BALL and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | BALL | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Ball Corporation | lululemon athletica inc. |
| Country | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry | Containers & Packaging | Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods |
| Market Capitalization | 12.99 billion USD | 20.02 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NasdaqGS |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | July 27, 2007 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of BALL and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | BALL | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | 2.56% | 0.19% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -11.61% | -14.00% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -9.83% | -45.05% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -23.82% | -48.01% |
| Month-to-Date Return | 1.28% | 0.08% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -13.66% | -55.37% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 3.84M | 3.23M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 2.58M | 4.56M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 22.64% | 50.25% |
| Beta | 1.14 | 1.03 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
BALL
12.36%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 33.32%
- Q3
- 19.47%
- Median
- 12.36%
- Q1
- 6.76%
- Min
- -12.20%
BALL’s Return on Equity of 12.36% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
LULU
42.05%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 46.95%
- Q3
- 26.41%
- Median
- 17.82%
- Q1
- 9.41%
- Min
- -8.23%
In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 42.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
BALL
5.36%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 11.45%
- Q3
- 8.67%
- Median
- 5.36%
- Q1
- 3.40%
- Min
- -2.25%
BALL’s Net Profit Margin of 5.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
LULU
16.38%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 21.16%
- Q3
- 13.26%
- Median
- 7.68%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -3.05%
A Net Profit Margin of 16.38% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
BALL
9.19%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 22.03%
- Q3
- 12.87%
- Median
- 9.18%
- Q1
- 6.39%
- Min
- -0.41%
BALL’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.19% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
LULU
22.88%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 28.42%
- Q3
- 20.87%
- Median
- 12.08%
- Q1
- 6.65%
- Min
- -0.12%
An Operating Profit Margin of 22.88% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | BALL | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 12.36% | 42.05% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 3.73% | 24.10% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 5.36% | 16.38% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 9.19% | 22.88% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 19.86% | 59.10% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
BALL
1.11
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 2.11
- Q3
- 1.55
- Median
- 1.33
- Q1
- 1.14
- Min
- 0.87
BALL’s Current Ratio of 1.11 falls into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
LULU
2.27
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 3.07
- Q3
- 2.20
- Median
- 1.62
- Q1
- 1.47
- Min
- 0.70
LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.27 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
BALL
1.32
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 3.86
- Q3
- 1.96
- Median
- 1.25
- Q1
- 0.67
- Min
- 0.23
BALL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.32 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
LULU
0.00
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.53
- Q3
- 1.30
- Median
- 0.59
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
BALL
3.38
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 13.16
- Q3
- 8.10
- Median
- 3.38
- Q1
- 2.83
- Min
- 1.06
BALL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.38 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
LULU
-47.83
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 85.38
- Q3
- 37.37
- Median
- 8.62
- Q1
- 4.18
- Min
- -32.49
LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | BALL | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.11 | 2.27 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.72 | 0.85 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 1.32 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 3.38 | -47.83 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
BALL
1.76%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 7.42%
- Q3
- 5.04%
- Median
- 3.96%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- 0.00%
BALL’s Dividend Yield of 1.76% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 4.60%
- Q3
- 3.43%
- Median
- 2.28%
- Q1
- 1.12%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
BALL
23.31%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 222.75%
- Q3
- 132.16%
- Median
- 63.96%
- Q1
- 27.01%
- Min
- 0.00%
BALL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 23.31% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 156.63%
- Q3
- 96.75%
- Median
- 57.64%
- Q1
- 34.78%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | BALL | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.76% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 23.31% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
BALL
18.85
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 19.86
- Q3
- 18.86
- Median
- 16.72
- Q1
- 13.58
- Min
- 6.36
BALL’s P/E Ratio of 18.85 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
LULU
11.82
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 76.57
- Q3
- 39.44
- Median
- 22.87
- Q1
- 14.62
- Min
- 7.99
In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 11.82 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
BALL
1.01
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 2.02
- Q3
- 1.14
- Median
- 0.89
- Q1
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.31
BALL’s P/S Ratio of 1.01 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
LULU
1.94
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.88
- Median
- 1.80
- Q1
- 0.93
- Min
- 0.28
LULU’s P/S Ratio of 1.94 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
BALL
2.52
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 4.37
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 2.17
- Q1
- 1.46
- Min
- 0.76
BALL’s P/B Ratio of 2.52 is within the conventional range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
LULU
5.37
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 11.14
- Q3
- 5.70
- Median
- 3.35
- Q1
- 2.02
- Min
- 0.56
LULU’s P/B Ratio of 5.37 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | BALL | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 18.85 | 11.82 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 1.01 | 1.94 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 2.52 | 5.37 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 14.47 | 14.67 |