BALL vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at BALL and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | BALL | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Ball Corporation | lululemon athletica inc. |
| Country | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry | Containers & Packaging | Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods |
| Market Capitalization | 13.68 billion USD | 20.82 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NasdaqGS |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | July 27, 2007 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of BALL and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | BALL | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | 1.31% | -1.97% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -14.44% | -29.11% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -3.50% | -37.97% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -24.42% | -32.60% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -0.34% | -1.32% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -8.85% | -54.08% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 2.20M | 4.51M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 2.40M | 4.65M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 22.65% | 49.88% |
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.03 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
BALL
9.56%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 36.99%
- Q3
- 19.86%
- Median
- 10.47%
- Q1
- 6.76%
- Min
- -0.20%
BALL’s Return on Equity of 9.56% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
LULU
42.05%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 42.05%
- Q3
- 24.41%
- Median
- 17.18%
- Q1
- 7.87%
- Min
- -8.23%
In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 42.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
BALL
4.48%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 10.84%
- Q3
- 8.25%
- Median
- 4.91%
- Q1
- 3.65%
- Min
- -0.12%
BALL’s Net Profit Margin of 4.48% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
LULU
16.38%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 21.16%
- Q3
- 13.26%
- Median
- 6.06%
- Q1
- 3.93%
- Min
- -3.05%
A Net Profit Margin of 16.38% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
BALL
7.89%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 22.03%
- Q3
- 13.09%
- Median
- 8.06%
- Q1
- 6.46%
- Min
- -0.07%
BALL’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.89% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
LULU
22.88%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 29.47%
- Q3
- 20.87%
- Median
- 11.68%
- Q1
- 6.26%
- Min
- -0.12%
An Operating Profit Margin of 22.88% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | BALL | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 9.56% | 42.05% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 3.04% | 24.10% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 4.48% | 16.38% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 7.89% | 22.88% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 20.17% | 59.10% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
BALL
1.00
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 1.96
- Q3
- 1.45
- Median
- 1.33
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- 0.87
BALL’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
LULU
2.27
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.94
- Q3
- 2.22
- Median
- 1.61
- Q1
- 1.48
- Min
- 0.74
LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.27 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
BALL
1.35
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 4.15
- Q3
- 2.03
- Median
- 1.20
- Q1
- 0.53
- Min
- 0.23
BALL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.35 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
LULU
0.00
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.79
- Q3
- 1.32
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
BALL
3.38
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 13.16
- Q3
- 8.10
- Median
- 3.38
- Q1
- 2.83
- Min
- 1.06
BALL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.38 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
LULU
-47.83
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 57.00
- Q3
- 32.83
- Median
- 7.87
- Q1
- 3.52
- Min
- -32.49
LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | BALL | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.00 | 2.27 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.67 | 0.85 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 3.38 | -47.83 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
BALL
1.69%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 7.14%
- Q3
- 4.65%
- Median
- 3.69%
- Q1
- 2.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
BALL’s Dividend Yield of 1.69% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 5.22%
- Q3
- 3.07%
- Median
- 2.34%
- Q1
- 1.11%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
BALL
29.25%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 222.75%
- Q3
- 132.16%
- Median
- 65.79%
- Q1
- 28.53%
- Min
- 0.00%
BALL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.25% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 156.63%
- Q3
- 94.60%
- Median
- 52.65%
- Q1
- 35.04%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | BALL | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.69% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 29.25% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
BALL
24.53
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 24.22
- Q3
- 20.28
- Median
- 17.07
- Q1
- 15.06
- Min
- 7.79
At 24.53, BALL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.
LULU
12.33
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 48.15
- Q3
- 33.82
- Median
- 20.70
- Q1
- 14.57
- Min
- 7.12
In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 12.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
BALL
1.10
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 1.99
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.94
- Q1
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.31
BALL’s P/S Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
LULU
2.02
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 4.35
- Q3
- 3.06
- Median
- 1.66
- Q1
- 0.83
- Min
- 0.26
LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
BALL
2.99
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 4.79
- Q3
- 3.32
- Median
- 2.14
- Q1
- 1.60
- Min
- 0.89
BALL’s P/B Ratio of 2.99 is within the conventional range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
LULU
5.37
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 9.74
- Q3
- 5.59
- Median
- 3.41
- Q1
- 2.01
- Min
- 0.56
LULU’s P/B Ratio of 5.37 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | BALL | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 24.53 | 12.33 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 1.10 | 2.02 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 2.99 | 5.37 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 12.16 | 15.29 |