Seek Returns logo

BALL vs. HLT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BALL and HLT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBALLHLT
Company NameBall CorporationHilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization14.94 billion USD64.17 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973December 12, 2013
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BALL and HLT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BALL vs. HLT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBALLHLT
5-Day Price Return1.57%4.57%
13-Week Price Return3.12%8.09%
26-Week Price Return7.06%0.91%
52-Week Price Return-11.54%32.72%
Month-to-Date Return-4.14%1.78%
Year-to-Date Return-0.44%10.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.09M1.59M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.66M2.16M
3-Month Volatility24.70%21.93%
Beta1.111.22

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BALL

9.56%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

BALL’s Return on Equity of 9.56% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HLT

171.01%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

HLT’s Return on Equity of 171.01% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BALL vs. HLT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BALL

4.48%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

BALL’s Net Profit Margin of 4.48% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HLT

13.84%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

HLT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.84% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BALL vs. HLT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BALL

7.89%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

BALL’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.89% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HLT

21.13%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

HLT’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.13% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BALL vs. HLT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBALLHLT
Return on Equity (TTM)9.56%171.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.04%9.75%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.48%13.84%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.89%21.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.17%36.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BALL

1.00

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

BALL’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HLT

0.54

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

HLT’s Current Ratio of 0.54 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BALL vs. HLT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BALL

1.35

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

BALL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.35 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HLT

73.65

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 73.65, HLT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

BALL vs. HLT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BALL

3.38

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

BALL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.38 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HLT

4.07

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

HLT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BALL vs. HLT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBALLHLT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.000.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.670.49
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.3573.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.384.07

Growth

Revenue Growth

BALL vs. HLT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BALL vs. HLT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BALL

1.57%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

BALL’s Dividend Yield of 1.57% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

HLT

0.23%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HLT’s Dividend Yield of 0.23% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BALL vs. HLT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BALL

29.25%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

BALL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.25% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HLT

9.25%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HLT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.25% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BALL vs. HLT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBALLHLT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.57%0.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.25%9.25%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BALL

26.50

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

BALL’s P/E Ratio of 26.50 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HLT

40.18

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

A P/E Ratio of 40.18 places HLT in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BALL vs. HLT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BALL

1.19

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

BALL’s P/S Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HLT

5.56

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

HLT’s P/S Ratio of 5.56 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BALL vs. HLT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BALL

2.99

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

BALL’s P/B Ratio of 2.99 is within the conventional range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HLT

245.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 245.97, HLT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BALL vs. HLT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBALLHLT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.5040.18
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.195.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.99245.97
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.1329.74