Seek Returns logo

BAH vs. FERG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BAH and FERG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBAHFERG
Company NameBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationFerguson Enterprises Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization13.46 billion USD46.88 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 18, 2010January 5, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAH and FERG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAH vs. FERG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBAHFERG
5-Day Price Return-1.78%1.09%
13-Week Price Return-14.88%30.78%
26-Week Price Return-10.04%25.94%
52-Week Price Return-25.75%10.39%
Month-to-Date Return2.15%4.61%
Year-to-Date Return-14.81%34.60%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.62M1.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.02M1.48M
3-Month Volatility42.38%37.84%
Beta0.431.12

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAH

107.71%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

BAH’s Return on Equity of 107.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FERG

28.84%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

In the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, FERG’s Return on Equity of 28.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BAH vs. FERG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAH

10.08%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

BAH’s Net Profit Margin of 10.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FERG

5.32%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

FERG’s Net Profit Margin of 5.32% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BAH vs. FERG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAH

13.60%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

BAH’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.60% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FERG

8.25%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

FERG’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.25% is around the midpoint for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BAH vs. FERG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBAHFERG
Return on Equity (TTM)107.71%28.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.12%9.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.08%5.32%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.60%8.25%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)67.65%30.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAH

1.78

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

BAH’s Current Ratio of 1.78 is in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FERG

1.64

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

FERG’s Current Ratio of 1.64 aligns with the median group of the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BAH vs. FERG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAH

3.74

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.74, BAH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FERG

0.74

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

FERG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.74 is typical for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BAH vs. FERG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAH

8.26

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

BAH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FERG

14.77

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

FERG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.77 is in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

BAH vs. FERG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBAHFERG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.781.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.700.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.740.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.2614.77

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAH vs. FERG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAH vs. FERG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAH

2.01%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

BAH’s Dividend Yield of 2.01% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FERG

1.42%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

FERG’s Dividend Yield of 1.42% is consistent with its peers in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BAH vs. FERG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAH

22.52%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

BAH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.52% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FERG

56.55%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

FERG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 56.55% is within the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BAH vs. FERG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBAHFERG
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.01%1.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.52%56.55%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAH

11.20

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, BAH’s P/E Ratio of 11.20 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FERG

28.25

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

A P/E Ratio of 28.25 places FERG in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BAH vs. FERG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAH

1.13

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

BAH’s P/S Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FERG

1.50

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

FERG’s P/S Ratio of 1.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BAH vs. FERG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAH

12.13

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

BAH’s P/B Ratio of 12.13 is in the upper tier for the Professional Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FERG

6.10

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

FERG’s P/B Ratio of 6.10 is in the upper tier for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BAH vs. FERG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBAHFERG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.2028.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.131.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.136.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.6932.69