Seek Returns logo

BAH vs. CAT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BAH and CAT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBAHCAT
Company NameBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationCaterpillar Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesMachinery
Market Capitalization13.76 billion USD193.81 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 18, 2010January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAH and CAT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAH vs. CAT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBAHCAT
5-Day Price Return0.76%-0.82%
13-Week Price Return-10.46%20.77%
26-Week Price Return-13.57%13.20%
52-Week Price Return-23.72%23.11%
Month-to-Date Return4.01%-5.55%
Year-to-Date Return-13.26%14.04%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.67M3.70M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.13M2.91M
3-Month Volatility42.52%22.05%
Beta0.431.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAH

107.71%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

BAH’s Return on Equity of 107.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CAT

49.92%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

CAT’s Return on Equity of 49.92% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BAH vs. CAT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAH

10.08%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

BAH’s Net Profit Margin of 10.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CAT

14.95%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.95% places CAT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BAH vs. CAT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAH

13.60%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

BAH’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.60% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CAT

18.23%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.23% places CAT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BAH vs. CAT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBAHCAT
Return on Equity (TTM)107.71%49.92%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.12%10.81%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.08%14.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.60%18.23%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)67.65%36.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAH

1.78

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

BAH’s Current Ratio of 1.78 is in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CAT

1.34

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

CAT’s Current Ratio of 1.34 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BAH vs. CAT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAH

3.74

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.74, BAH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CAT

2.18

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.18, CAT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

BAH vs. CAT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAH

8.26

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

BAH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CAT

12.53

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

CAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BAH vs. CAT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBAHCAT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.781.34
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.700.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.742.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.2612.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAH vs. CAT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAH vs. CAT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAH

2.02%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

BAH’s Dividend Yield of 2.02% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CAT

1.40%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

CAT’s Dividend Yield of 1.40% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BAH vs. CAT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAH

22.52%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

BAH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.52% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CAT

28.60%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

CAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.60% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

BAH vs. CAT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBAHCAT
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.02%1.40%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.52%28.60%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAH

11.14

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, BAH’s P/E Ratio of 11.14 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CAT

20.49

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

CAT’s P/E Ratio of 20.49 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BAH vs. CAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAH

1.12

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

BAH’s P/S Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CAT

3.06

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

CAT’s P/S Ratio of 3.06 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BAH vs. CAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAH

12.13

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

BAH’s P/B Ratio of 12.13 is in the upper tier for the Professional Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CAT

9.78

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

At 9.78, CAT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BAH vs. CAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBAHCAT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.1420.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.123.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.139.78
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.6124.99