BAC vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 17, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BAC and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	BAC	TTWO
Company Name	Bank of America Corporation	Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Communication Services
GICS Industry	Banks	Entertainment
Market Capitalization	369.16 billion USD	47.61 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	April 15, 1997
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAC and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAC vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	TTWO
5-Day Price Return	-1.27%	0.44%
13-Week Price Return	6.40%	6.54%
26-Week Price Return	33.91%	23.52%
52-Week Price Return	24.72%	69.55%
Month-to-Date Return	-3.39%	-0.11%
Year-to-Date Return	13.40%	40.19%
10-Day Avg. Volume	24.52M	1.82M
3-Month Avg. Volume	36.81M	1.81M
3-Month Volatility	17.95%	24.38%
Beta	1.33	0.96

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAC

9.46%

Banks Industry

Max: 25.40%
Q3: 15.55%
Median: 12.00%
Q1: 8.98%
Min: -0.10%

BAC’s Return on Equity of 9.46% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-98.81%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 42.50%
Q3: 24.06%
Median: 13.69%
Q1: 5.35%
Min: -17.95%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -98.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

BAC vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAC

30.16%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.73%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.56%
Min: 6.98%

BAC’s Net Profit Margin of 30.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-72.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 45.33%
Q3: 24.40%
Median: 13.94%
Q1: 4.28%
Min: -23.67%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -72.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

BAC vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAC

32.74%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.73%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 12.28%

BAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.74% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-72.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 41.77%
Q3: 28.26%
Median: 16.13%
Q1: 8.03%
Min: -3.93%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

BAC vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	TTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)	9.46%	-98.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.84%	-37.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	30.16%	-72.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	32.74%	-72.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	56.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

TTWO

1.16

Entertainment Industry

Max: 6.76
Q3: 4.02
Median: 1.55
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.38

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BAC vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

2.54

Banks Industry

Max: 5.78
Q3: 2.66
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.40
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

TTWO

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max: 1.54
Q3: 0.77
Median: 0.16
Q1: 0.02
Min: 0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BAC vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max: 87.17
Q3: 35.59
Median: 7.06
Q1: 1.13
Min: -44.74

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

BAC vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	TTWO
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.54	0.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	-44.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAC vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAC vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAC

2.55%

Banks Industry

Max: 11.03%
Q3: 6.00%
Median: 3.87%
Q1: 2.41%
Min: 0.00%

BAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.55% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 2.90%
Q3: 1.29%
Median: 0.59%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BAC vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAC

33.91%

Banks Industry

Max: 134.24%
Q3: 79.39%
Median: 55.09%
Q1: 36.09%
Min: 0.00%

BAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.91% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 82.30%
Q3: 38.45%
Median: 29.74%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BAC vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	TTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.55%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	33.91%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAC

13.29

Banks Industry

Max: 22.69
Q3: 13.75
Median: 10.32
Q1: 7.73
Min: 2.59

BAC’s P/E Ratio of 13.29 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TTWO

Entertainment Industry

Max: 92.09
Q3: 54.51
Median: 28.92
Q1: 19.75
Min: 2.96

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

BAC vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAC

2.33

Banks Industry

Max: 4.90
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

TTWO

8.26

Entertainment Industry

Max: 12.34
Q3: 7.67
Median: 5.06
Q1: 2.72
Min: 0.67

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 8.26 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BAC vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

1.17

Banks Industry

Max: 2.09
Q3: 1.40
Median: 1.11
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.29

BAC’s P/B Ratio of 1.17 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TTWO

12.74

Entertainment Industry

Max: 22.84
Q3: 10.54
Median: 6.60
Q1: 2.30
Min: 0.65

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 12.74 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BAC vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	TTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	13.29	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.33	8.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.17	12.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	8.48	212.87