BAC vs. TM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 28, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BAC and TM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BAC is a standard domestic listing, while TM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	BAC	TM
Company Name	Bank of America Corporation	Toyota Motor Corporation
Country	United States	Japan
GICS Sector	Financials	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Banks	Automobiles
Market Capitalization	366.50 billion USD	260.22 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAC and TM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAC vs. TM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	TM
5-Day Price Return	2.91%	1.38%
13-Week Price Return	14.25%	12.33%
26-Week Price Return	7.54%	4.16%
52-Week Price Return	26.10%	14.38%
Month-to-Date Return	4.68%	9.14%
Year-to-Date Return	12.58%	-6.45%
10-Day Avg. Volume	32.81M	27.75M
3-Month Avg. Volume	38.93M	28.99M
3-Month Volatility	19.08%	36.70%
Beta	1.36	1.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAC

9.46%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

BAC’s Return on Equity of 9.46% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TM

12.02%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 25.70%
Q3: 12.88%
Median: 6.92%
Q1: 0.71%
Min: -15.89%

TM’s Return on Equity of 12.02% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BAC vs. TM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAC

30.16%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

BAC’s Net Profit Margin of 30.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TM

8.82%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 9.92%
Q3: 5.78%
Median: 3.23%
Q1: 0.11%
Min: -5.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 8.82% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BAC vs. TM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAC

32.74%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

BAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.74% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TM

9.60%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 13.07%
Q3: 7.22%
Median: 5.29%
Q1: 0.43%
Min: -4.46%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.60% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BAC vs. TM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	TM
Return on Equity (TTM)	9.46%	12.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.84%	4.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	30.16%	8.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	32.74%	9.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	19.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

TM

1.27

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.19
Q3: 1.54
Median: 1.26
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.48

TM’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BAC vs. TM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

2.54

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

TM

1.07

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.34
Q3: 1.13
Median: 0.58
Q1: 0.28
Min: 0.06

TM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BAC vs. TM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

TM

Automobiles Industry

Max: 77.87
Q3: 42.86
Median: 13.88
Q1: 2.13
Min: -49.07

Interest Coverage Ratio data for TM is currently unavailable.

BAC vs. TM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	TM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.27
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.54	1.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAC vs. TM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAC vs. TM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAC

2.66%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

BAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.66% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TM

3.09%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 10.71%
Q3: 5.39%
Median: 3.14%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TM’s Dividend Yield of 3.09% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BAC vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAC

33.91%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

BAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.91% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TM

38.83%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 114.43%
Q3: 59.30%
Median: 37.15%
Q1: 16.40%
Min: 0.00%

TM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.83% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BAC vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	TM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.66%	3.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	33.91%	38.83%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAC

12.73

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

A P/E Ratio of 12.73 places BAC in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TM

8.93

Automobiles Industry

Max: 27.69
Q3: 19.99
Median: 9.85
Q1: 6.60
Min: 4.25

TM’s P/E Ratio of 8.93 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BAC vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAC

2.33

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

TM

0.79

Automobiles Industry

Max: 1.52
Q3: 0.84
Median: 0.41
Q1: 0.23
Min: 0.08

TM’s P/S Ratio of 0.79 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BAC vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

1.17

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

BAC’s P/B Ratio of 1.17 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TM

1.09

Automobiles Industry

Max: 4.25
Q3: 2.00
Median: 0.87
Q1: 0.46
Min: 0.19

TM’s P/B Ratio of 1.09 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BAC vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	TM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	12.73	8.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.33	0.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.17	1.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	8.12	52.42