BAC vs. RDDT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BAC and RDDT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	BAC	RDDT
Company Name	Bank of America Corporation	Reddit, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Communication Services
GICS Industry	Banks	Interactive Media & Services
Market Capitalization	387.49 billion USD	36.33 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	March 21, 2024
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAC and RDDT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAC vs. RDDT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	RDDT
5-Day Price Return	-4.01%	-5.33%
13-Week Price Return	7.43%	-21.58%
26-Week Price Return	15.06%	71.31%
52-Week Price Return	12.16%	46.38%
Month-to-Date Return	-3.69%	-7.49%
Year-to-Date Return	17.13%	18.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume	39.14M	5.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume	35.67M	6.41M
3-Month Volatility	20.76%	65.76%
Beta	1.32	2.21

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAC

9.92%

Banks Industry

Max: 25.75%
Q3: 15.51%
Median: 11.91%
Q1: 8.65%
Min: -1.41%

BAC’s Return on Equity of 9.92% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RDDT

14.94%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max: 51.86%
Q3: 34.65%
Median: 13.84%
Q1: 6.07%
Min: -21.93%

RDDT’s Return on Equity of 14.94% is on par with the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BAC vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAC

30.16%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.60%
Median: 28.95%
Q1: 22.27%
Min: 2.66%

BAC’s Net Profit Margin of 30.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RDDT

18.33%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max: 49.74%
Q3: 30.89%
Median: 20.53%
Q1: 7.75%
Min: -11.99%

RDDT’s Net Profit Margin of 18.33% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BAC vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAC

32.74%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.30%
Median: 37.14%
Q1: 28.21%
Min: 12.28%

BAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.74% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RDDT

13.81%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max: 65.96%
Q3: 35.84%
Median: 19.27%
Q1: 12.16%
Min: -18.13%

RDDT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.81% is around the midpoint for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BAC vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	RDDT
Return on Equity (TTM)	9.92%	14.94%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.88%	13.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	30.16%	18.33%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	32.74%	13.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	91.21%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

RDDT

12.13

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max: 3.92
Q3: 2.52
Median: 1.78
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.25

RDDT’s Current Ratio of 12.13 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

BAC vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

2.33

Banks Industry

Max: 5.78
Q3: 2.55
Median: 0.94
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

RDDT

0.00

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max: 0.87
Q3: 0.52
Median: 0.30
Q1: 0.04
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, RDDT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BAC vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

RDDT

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max: 16.48
Q3: 16.48
Median: 6.73
Q1: -0.50
Min: -3.62

Interest Coverage Ratio data for RDDT is currently unavailable.

BAC vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	RDDT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	12.13
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	12.04
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.33	0.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAC vs. RDDT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAC vs. RDDT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAC

2.48%

Banks Industry

Max: 9.92%
Q3: 5.44%
Median: 3.78%
Q1: 2.38%
Min: 0.00%

BAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.48% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RDDT

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max: 3.24%
Q3: 1.57%
Median: 0.29%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RDDT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BAC vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAC

31.97%

Banks Industry

Max: 135.42%
Q3: 78.13%
Median: 52.54%
Q1: 35.48%
Min: 0.00%

BAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.97% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

RDDT

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max: 101.53%
Q3: 41.32%
Median: 8.01%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RDDT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BAC vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	RDDT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.48%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	31.97%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAC

12.90

Banks Industry

Max: 21.36
Q3: 13.70
Median: 10.55
Q1: 8.08
Min: 2.84

BAC’s P/E Ratio of 12.90 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RDDT

101.79

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max: 45.88
Q3: 35.11
Median: 24.08
Q1: 16.48
Min: 1.73

At 101.79, RDDT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BAC vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAC

2.33

Banks Industry

Max: 4.90
Q3: 2.97
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.58
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

RDDT

18.66

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max: 18.66
Q3: 9.65
Median: 5.89
Q1: 2.17
Min: 0.00

RDDT’s P/S Ratio of 18.66 is in the upper echelon for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BAC vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

1.24

Banks Industry

Max: 2.14
Q3: 1.43
Median: 1.13
Q1: 0.87
Min: 0.25

BAC’s P/B Ratio of 1.24 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RDDT

16.49

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max: 16.71
Q3: 8.07
Median: 4.11
Q1: 1.91
Min: 0.16

RDDT’s P/B Ratio of 16.49 is in the upper tier for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BAC vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	RDDT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	12.90	101.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.33	18.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.24	16.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	5.25	69.73