Seek Returns logo

BAC vs. PG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BAC and PG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBACPG
Company NameBank of America CorporationThe Procter & Gamble Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBanksHousehold Products
Market Capitalization349.90 billion USD364.03 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAC and PG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAC vs. PG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBACPG
5-Day Price Return5.16%1.25%
13-Week Price Return8.95%-3.41%
26-Week Price Return-1.05%-7.98%
52-Week Price Return23.76%-6.83%
Month-to-Date Return-0.06%3.28%
Year-to-Date Return7.49%-7.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume35.63M7.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume44.57M8.47M
3-Month Volatility20.76%15.96%
Beta1.360.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAC

9.46%

Banks Industry

Max
26.37%
Q3
15.92%
Median
12.25%
Q1
8.69%
Min
0.15%

BAC’s Return on Equity of 9.46% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PG

30.78%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

PG’s Return on Equity of 30.78% is on par with the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BAC vs. PG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAC

30.16%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.70%
Median
28.97%
Q1
22.53%
Min
6.98%

BAC’s Net Profit Margin of 30.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PG

18.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

PG’s Net Profit Margin of 18.95% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

BAC vs. PG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAC

32.74%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.59%
Median
37.24%
Q1
28.25%
Min
13.37%

BAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.74% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PG

23.32%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

PG’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.32% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

BAC vs. PG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBACPG
Return on Equity (TTM)9.46%30.78%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.84%12.85%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)30.16%18.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.74%23.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--51.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PG

0.70

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

PG’s Current Ratio of 0.70 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BAC vs. PG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

2.54

Banks Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.62
Median
1.02
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

PG

0.66

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

PG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.66 is typical for the Household Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BAC vs. PG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAC

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

PG

47.04

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

PG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 47.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BAC vs. PG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBACPG
Current Ratio (MRQ)--0.70
Quick Ratio (MRQ)--0.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.540.66
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--47.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAC vs. PG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAC vs. PG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAC

2.70%

Banks Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
5.83%
Median
3.81%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.00%

BAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.70% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PG

2.69%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Yield of 2.69% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BAC vs. PG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAC

33.91%

Banks Industry

Max
147.07%
Q3
80.55%
Median
54.40%
Q1
35.71%
Min
0.00%

BAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.91% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

PG

61.80%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.80% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BAC vs. PG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBACPG
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.70%2.69%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.91%61.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAC

12.56

Banks Industry

Max
20.05
Q3
12.65
Median
10.21
Q1
7.54
Min
2.74

BAC’s P/E Ratio of 12.56 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PG

22.97

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

A P/E Ratio of 22.97 places PG in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BAC vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAC

2.33

Banks Industry

Max
5.06
Q3
2.98
Median
2.24
Q1
1.59
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

PG

4.35

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

PG’s P/S Ratio of 4.35 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BAC vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

1.17

Banks Industry

Max
2.18
Q3
1.36
Median
1.09
Q1
0.81
Min
0.20

BAC’s P/B Ratio of 1.17 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PG

7.14

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

PG’s P/B Ratio of 7.14 is within the conventional range for the Household Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BAC vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBACPG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.5622.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.334.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.177.14
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.0126.12