Seek Returns logo

BAC vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BAC and IBM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBACIBM
Company NameBank of America CorporationInternational Business Machines Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryBanksIT Services
Market Capitalization349.90 billion USD223.63 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAC and IBM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAC vs. IBM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBACIBM
5-Day Price Return5.16%-4.03%
13-Week Price Return8.95%-5.37%
26-Week Price Return-1.05%-5.28%
52-Week Price Return23.76%26.70%
Month-to-Date Return-0.06%-5.17%
Year-to-Date Return7.49%9.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume35.63M6.81M
3-Month Avg. Volume44.57M4.78M
3-Month Volatility20.76%25.75%
Beta1.360.69

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAC

9.46%

Banks Industry

Max
26.37%
Q3
15.92%
Median
12.25%
Q1
8.69%
Min
0.15%

BAC’s Return on Equity of 9.46% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IBM

21.99%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.99% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BAC vs. IBM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAC

30.16%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.70%
Median
28.97%
Q1
22.53%
Min
6.98%

BAC’s Net Profit Margin of 30.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IBM

9.11%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BAC vs. IBM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAC

32.74%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.59%
Median
37.24%
Q1
28.25%
Min
13.37%

BAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.74% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IBM

9.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.77% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BAC vs. IBM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBACIBM
Return on Equity (TTM)9.46%21.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.84%4.12%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)30.16%9.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.74%9.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--57.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

IBM

0.91

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.91 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BAC vs. IBM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

2.54

Banks Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.62
Median
1.02
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

IBM

2.33

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.33. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BAC vs. IBM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAC

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BAC vs. IBM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBACIBM
Current Ratio (MRQ)--0.91
Quick Ratio (MRQ)--0.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.542.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--45.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAC vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAC vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAC

2.70%

Banks Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
5.83%
Median
3.81%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.00%

BAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.70% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IBM

2.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.77%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BAC vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAC

33.91%

Banks Industry

Max
147.07%
Q3
80.55%
Median
54.40%
Q1
35.71%
Min
0.00%

BAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.91% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

IBM

75.57%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 75.57% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

BAC vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBACIBM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.70%2.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.91%75.57%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAC

12.56

Banks Industry

Max
20.05
Q3
12.65
Median
10.21
Q1
7.54
Min
2.74

BAC’s P/E Ratio of 12.56 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IBM

38.31

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

A P/E Ratio of 38.31 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BAC vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAC

2.33

Banks Industry

Max
5.06
Q3
2.98
Median
2.24
Q1
1.59
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

IBM

3.49

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 3.49 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BAC vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

1.17

Banks Industry

Max
2.18
Q3
1.36
Median
1.09
Q1
0.81
Min
0.20

BAC’s P/B Ratio of 1.17 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IBM

9.96

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.96 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BAC vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBACIBM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.5638.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.333.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.179.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.0119.01