BAC vs. HIMS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 15, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BAC and HIMS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	BAC	HIMS
Company Name	Bank of America Corporation	Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Health Care
GICS Industry	Banks	Health Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization	369.16 billion USD	13.15 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	September 13, 2019
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAC and HIMS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAC vs. HIMS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	HIMS
5-Day Price Return	-1.27%	0.52%
13-Week Price Return	6.40%	13.52%
26-Week Price Return	33.91%	107.82%
52-Week Price Return	24.72%	199.23%
Month-to-Date Return	-3.39%	2.56%
Year-to-Date Return	13.40%	140.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume	24.52M	27.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume	36.81M	35.47M
3-Month Volatility	17.95%	80.79%
Beta	1.33	2.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAC

9.46%

Banks Industry

Max: 25.40%
Q3: 15.55%
Median: 12.00%
Q1: 8.98%
Min: -0.10%

BAC’s Return on Equity of 9.46% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HIMS

38.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max: 24.86%
Q3: 15.79%
Median: 8.56%
Q1: 5.75%
Min: -1.64%

HIMS’s Return on Equity of 38.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BAC vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAC

30.16%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.73%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.56%
Min: 6.98%

BAC’s Net Profit Margin of 30.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HIMS

9.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max: 11.56%
Q3: 5.45%
Median: 2.83%
Q1: 1.13%
Min: -1.71%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.62% places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BAC vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAC

32.74%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.73%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 12.28%

BAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.74% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HIMS

6.24%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max: 19.08%
Q3: 9.66%
Median: 4.77%
Q1: 2.46%
Min: -0.83%

HIMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.24% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BAC vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	HIMS
Return on Equity (TTM)	9.46%	38.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.84%	18.98%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	30.16%	9.62%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	32.74%	6.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	76.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

HIMS

4.98

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max: 2.00
Q3: 1.51
Median: 1.29
Q1: 0.92
Min: 0.14

HIMS’s Current Ratio of 4.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

BAC vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

2.54

Banks Industry

Max: 5.78
Q3: 2.66
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.40
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

HIMS

1.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max: 2.29
Q3: 1.24
Median: 0.74
Q1: 0.50
Min: 0.00

HIMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.72. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BAC vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

HIMS

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max: 14.47
Q3: 7.50
Median: 4.52
Q1: 2.12
Min: -4.44

Interest Coverage Ratio data for HIMS is currently unavailable.

BAC vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	HIMS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	4.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	4.30
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.54	1.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAC vs. HIMS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAC vs. HIMS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAC

2.55%

Banks Industry

Max: 11.03%
Q3: 6.00%
Median: 3.87%
Q1: 2.41%
Min: 0.00%

BAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.55% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max: 5.93%
Q3: 2.59%
Median: 1.35%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

HIMS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BAC vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAC

33.91%

Banks Industry

Max: 134.24%
Q3: 79.39%
Median: 55.09%
Q1: 36.09%
Min: 0.00%

BAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.91% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max: 185.33%
Q3: 74.82%
Median: 36.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

HIMS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BAC vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	HIMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.55%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	33.91%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAC

13.29

Banks Industry

Max: 22.69
Q3: 13.75
Median: 10.32
Q1: 7.73
Min: 2.59

BAC’s P/E Ratio of 13.29 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HIMS

67.91

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max: 40.02
Q3: 29.75
Median: 21.09
Q1: 14.18
Min: 7.05

At 67.91, HIMS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BAC vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAC

2.33

Banks Industry

Max: 4.90
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

HIMS

6.53

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max: 3.15
Q3: 1.87
Median: 0.74
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 6.53, HIMS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BAC vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

1.17

Banks Industry

Max: 2.09
Q3: 1.40
Median: 1.11
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.29

BAC’s P/B Ratio of 1.17 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HIMS

19.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max: 7.33
Q3: 4.45
Median: 2.52
Q1: 1.15
Min: 0.66

At 19.83, HIMS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BAC vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BAC	HIMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	13.29	67.91
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.33	6.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.17	19.83
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	8.48	55.59