Seek Returns logo

BAC vs. EQH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BAC and EQH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBACEQH
Company NameBank of America CorporationEquitable Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryBanksFinancial Services
Market Capitalization349.90 billion USD16.36 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973May 10, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BAC and EQH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BAC vs. EQH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBACEQH
5-Day Price Return5.16%8.50%
13-Week Price Return8.95%1.24%
26-Week Price Return-1.05%4.50%
52-Week Price Return23.76%42.81%
Month-to-Date Return-0.06%6.35%
Year-to-Date Return7.49%15.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume35.63M3.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume44.57M2.69M
3-Month Volatility20.76%28.39%
Beta1.361.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BAC

9.46%

Banks Industry

Max
26.37%
Q3
15.92%
Median
12.25%
Q1
8.69%
Min
0.15%

BAC’s Return on Equity of 9.46% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EQH

56.77%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

EQH’s Return on Equity of 56.77% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BAC vs. EQH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BAC

30.16%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.70%
Median
28.97%
Q1
22.53%
Min
6.98%

BAC’s Net Profit Margin of 30.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EQH

3.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, EQH’s Net Profit Margin of 3.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BAC vs. EQH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BAC

32.74%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.59%
Median
37.24%
Q1
28.25%
Min
13.37%

BAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.74% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EQH

17.41%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

EQH’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.41% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BAC vs. EQH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBACEQH
Return on Equity (TTM)9.46%56.77%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.84%0.43%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)30.16%3.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.74%17.41%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--51.52%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

EQH

1.35

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BAC vs. EQH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

2.54

Banks Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.62
Median
1.02
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

EQH

8.49

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

BAC vs. EQH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BAC

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

EQH

1.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

BAC vs. EQH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBACEQH
Current Ratio (MRQ)--1.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)--1.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.548.49
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--1.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

BAC vs. EQH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BAC vs. EQH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BAC

2.70%

Banks Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
5.83%
Median
3.81%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.00%

BAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.70% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EQH

2.34%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Yield of 2.34% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BAC vs. EQH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BAC

33.91%

Banks Industry

Max
147.07%
Q3
80.55%
Median
54.40%
Q1
35.71%
Min
0.00%

BAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.91% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

EQH

21.08%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.08% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BAC vs. EQH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBACEQH
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.70%2.34%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.91%21.08%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BAC

12.56

Banks Industry

Max
20.05
Q3
12.65
Median
10.21
Q1
7.54
Min
2.74

BAC’s P/E Ratio of 12.56 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EQH

34.13

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

A P/E Ratio of 34.13 places EQH in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BAC vs. EQH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BAC

2.33

Banks Industry

Max
5.06
Q3
2.98
Median
2.24
Q1
1.59
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

EQH

1.03

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

BAC vs. EQH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BAC

1.17

Banks Industry

Max
2.18
Q3
1.36
Median
1.09
Q1
0.81
Min
0.20

BAC’s P/B Ratio of 1.17 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EQH

6.66

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

EQH’s P/B Ratio of 6.66 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BAC vs. EQH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBACEQH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.5634.13
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.331.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.176.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.018.04