Seek Returns logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

BABAF vs. LVMHF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here's a clear look at BABAF and LVMHF, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBABAFLVMHF
Company NameAlibaba Group Holding LimitedLVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
CountryHong KongFrance
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS Industry GroupConsumer Discretionary Distribution & RetailConsumer Durables & Apparel
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
GICS Sub-IndustryBroadline RetailApparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization297.95 billion USD270.76 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeOTC Markets OTCPKOTC Markets OTCPK
Listing DateNovember 27, 2019April 26, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

BABAF's market capitalization stands at 297.95 billion USD, while LVMHF's is 270.76 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BABAF and LVMHF by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BABAF vs. LVMHF: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBABAFLVMHF
5-Day Price Return-0.52%3.36%
13-Week Price Return-17.18%-26.60%
26-Week Price Return-29.00%-9.50%
52-Week Price Return-5.96%-9.38%
Month-to-Date Return-2.72%1.72%
Year-to-Date Return-16.73%-26.97%
10-Day Avg. Volume10.56M0.60M
3-Month Avg. Volume11.55M0.46M
3-Month Volatility43.79%30.30%
Beta0.481.08

LVMHF carries a higher beta at 1.08, indicating it's more sensitive to market moves, while BABAF (beta: 0.48) exhibits greater stability.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BABAF

9.06%

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
52.86%
Q3
29.34%
Median
16.16%
Q1
8.94%
Min
-20.75%

BABAF's Return on Equity of 9.06% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LVMHF

16.54%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
45.05%
Q3
23.75%
Median
16.54%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-5.37%

LVMHF's Return on Equity of 16.54% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BABAF vs. LVMHF: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BABAF

9.13%

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
23.01%
Q3
12.76%
Median
7.30%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-7.13%

BABAF's Net Profit Margin of 9.13% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LVMHF

13.26%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
28.16%
Q3
13.73%
Median
6.95%
Q1
3.54%
Min
-10.44%

LVMHF's Net Profit Margin of 13.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BABAF vs. LVMHF: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BABAF

7.82%

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
26.71%
Q3
18.06%
Median
10.35%
Q1
7.32%
Min
-5.20%

BABAF's Operating Profit Margin of 7.82% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LVMHF

20.87%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
41.17%
Q3
20.96%
Median
12.51%
Q1
5.73%
Min
-4.90%

LVMHF's Operating Profit Margin of 20.87% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BABAF vs. LVMHF: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBABAFLVMHF
Return on Equity (TTM)9.06%16.54%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.01%7.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.13%13.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.82%20.87%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)40.75%66.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BABAF

1.33

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
3.72
Q3
2.39
Median
1.48
Q1
1.19
Min
0.69

BABAF's Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LVMHF

1.48

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
2.86
Q3
2.20
Median
1.66
Q1
1.47
Min
0.75

LVMHF's Current Ratio of 1.48 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BABAF vs. LVMHF: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BABAF

0.25

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
2.11
Q3
1.35
Median
0.53
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, BABAF's Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.25 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LVMHF

0.60

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
2.84
Q3
1.38
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

LVMHF's Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BABAF vs. LVMHF: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BABAF

9.56

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
9.56
Q1
4.03
Min
-19.29

BABAF's Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LVMHF

61.50

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
85.38
Q3
37.37
Median
8.74
Q1
3.85
Min
-32.49

LVMHF's Interest Coverage Ratio of 61.50 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

BABAF vs. LVMHF: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBABAFLVMHF
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.331.48
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.830.68
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.250.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.5661.50

Growth

Revenue Growth

BABAF vs. LVMHF: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolBABAFLVMHF
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)1.67%-4.48%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)3.56%-3.24%
3-Year Revenue CAGR5.31%0.68%
5-Year Revenue CAGR14.35%12.60%

EPS Growth

BABAF vs. LVMHF: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolBABAFLVMHF
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)-66.84%-21.42%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)-22.23%-21.26%
3-Year EPS CAGR33.08%-7.97%
5-Year EPS CAGR-0.85%18.56%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BABAF

3.58%

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
7.29%
Q3
3.35%
Median
0.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.58%, BABAF offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LVMHF

2.87%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
5.94%
Q3
3.62%
Median
2.45%
Q1
1.29%
Min
0.00%

LVMHF's Dividend Yield of 2.87% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BABAF vs. LVMHF: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BABAF

187.88%

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
120.88%
Q3
67.91%
Median
26.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABAF's Dividend Payout Ratio of 187.88% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

LVMHF

61.30%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
203.80%
Q3
104.14%
Median
54.33%
Q1
31.52%
Min
0.00%

LVMHF's Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.30% is within the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BABAF vs. LVMHF: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBABAFLVMHF
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.58%2.87%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)187.88%61.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BABAF

18.86

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
43.55
Q3
29.16
Median
19.11
Q1
10.83
Min
6.87

BABAF's P/E Ratio of 18.86 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LVMHF

21.32

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
55.49
Q3
32.51
Median
21.32
Q1
12.55
Min
6.93

LVMHF's P/E Ratio of 21.32 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BABAF vs. LVMHF: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BABAF

1.72

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
5.00
Q3
3.05
Median
1.76
Q1
0.81
Min
0.19

BABAF's P/S Ratio of 1.72 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LVMHF

2.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
4.64
Q3
2.69
Median
1.62
Q1
0.97
Min
0.39

LVMHF's P/S Ratio of 2.83 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BABAF vs. LVMHF: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BABAF

2.35

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
9.90
Q3
5.37
Median
3.36
Q1
1.83
Min
0.79

BABAF's P/B Ratio of 2.35 is within the conventional range for the Broadline Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock's price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LVMHF

3.41

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
Max
9.65
Q3
5.23
Median
3.57
Q1
2.15
Min
0.59

LVMHF's P/B Ratio of 3.41 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock's price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BABAF vs. LVMHF: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBABAFLVMHF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.8621.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.722.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.353.41
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)176.0416.27