Seek Returns logo

BABA vs. XYZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BABA and XYZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BABA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, XYZ is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBABAXYZ
Company NameAlibaba Group Holding LimitedBlock, Inc.
CountryHong KongUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryFinancials
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailFinancial Services
Market Capitalization435.84 billion USD44.91 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 19, 2014November 19, 2015
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BABA and XYZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BABA vs. XYZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBABAXYZ
5-Day Price Return4.17%-0.38%
13-Week Price Return60.38%7.51%
26-Week Price Return34.76%28.79%
52-Week Price Return72.24%9.34%
Month-to-Date Return2.27%1.56%
Year-to-Date Return115.57%-13.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume21.92M7.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.44M9.33M
3-Month Volatility49.36%39.48%
Beta0.312.67

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BABA

14.91%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 14.91% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

XYZ

13.95%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

XYZ’s Return on Equity of 13.95% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

14.82%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.82% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

XYZ

12.41%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

XYZ’s Net Profit Margin of 12.41% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

13.98%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

BABA’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.98% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

XYZ

4.82%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

XYZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.82% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

BABA vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBABAXYZ
Return on Equity (TTM)14.91%13.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.16%8.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.82%12.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.98%4.82%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.18%39.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.45

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

XYZ

1.96

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BABA vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

0.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

XYZ

0.26

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

BABA vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BABA

9.56

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

XYZ

12.18

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

BABA vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBABAXYZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.451.96
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.971.92
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.230.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.5612.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

BABA vs. XYZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BABA vs. XYZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BABA

1.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is consistent with its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

XYZ

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

XYZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BABA vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BABA

103.01%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 103.01% is in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

XYZ

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

XYZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BABA vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBABAXYZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.88%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)103.01%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BABA

20.82

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 20.82 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

XYZ

15.07

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

XYZ’s P/E Ratio of 15.07 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BABA vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BABA

3.08

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 3.08 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

XYZ

1.87

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

BABA vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.90

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 1.90 is within the conventional range for the Broadline Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

XYZ

1.89

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

XYZ’s P/B Ratio of 1.89 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BABA vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBABAXYZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.8215.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.081.87
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.901.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)39.8241.56