Seek Returns logo

BABA vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BABA and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both BABA and VIPS are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolBABAVIPS
Company NameAlibaba Group Holding LimitedVipshop Holdings Limited
CountryHong KongChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization435.84 billion USD9.09 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 19, 2014March 23, 2012
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BABA and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BABA vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBABAVIPS
5-Day Price Return4.17%6.33%
13-Week Price Return60.38%30.50%
26-Week Price Return34.76%20.27%
52-Week Price Return72.24%24.54%
Month-to-Date Return2.27%17.32%
Year-to-Date Return115.57%45.81%
10-Day Avg. Volume21.92M3.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.44M2.85M
3-Month Volatility49.36%27.32%
Beta0.310.85

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BABA

14.91%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 14.91% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VIPS

17.61%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 17.61% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

14.82%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.82% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VIPS

6.53%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

13.98%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

BABA’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.98% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VIPS

7.65%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.65% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

BABA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBABAVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)14.91%17.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.16%9.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.82%6.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.98%7.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.18%23.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.45

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIPS

1.26

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BABA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

0.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VIPS

0.17

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BABA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BABA

9.56

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

BABA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBABAVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.451.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.971.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.230.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.56150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

BABA vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BABA vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BABA

1.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is consistent with its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BABA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BABA

103.01%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 103.01% is in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BABA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBABAVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.88%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)103.01%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BABA

20.82

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 20.82 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIPS

9.96

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 9.96 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

BABA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BABA

3.08

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 3.08 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VIPS

0.65

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.65 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

BABA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.90

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 1.90 is within the conventional range for the Broadline Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VIPS

1.40

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

BABA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBABAVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.829.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.080.65
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.901.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)39.82--