Seek Returns logo

BABA vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BABA and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BABA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, UBER is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBABAUBER
Company NameAlibaba Group Holding LimitedUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryHong KongUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailGround Transportation
Market Capitalization302.48 billion USD189.42 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 19, 2014May 10, 2019
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BABA and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BABA vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBABAUBER
5-Day Price Return4.88%-1.99%
13-Week Price Return-4.29%3.10%
26-Week Price Return26.38%29.78%
52-Week Price Return56.79%31.14%
Month-to-Date Return5.16%3.51%
Year-to-Date Return49.62%50.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.40M21.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.86M21.23M
3-Month Volatility38.28%32.88%
Beta0.111.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BABA

13.27%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 13.27% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BABA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

12.99%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.99% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BABA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

14.14%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

BABA’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.14% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBABAUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)13.27%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.19%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.99%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.14%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.95%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BABA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

0.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BABA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BABA

9.56

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

BABA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBABAUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.551.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.080.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.230.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.56-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

BABA vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BABA vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BABA

2.85%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.85%, BABA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BABA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BABA

103.01%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 103.01% is in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BABA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBABAUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.85%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)103.01%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BABA

15.70

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 15.70 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

14.99

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 14.99 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BABA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BABA

2.04

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 2.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

4.00

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 4.00 is in the upper echelon for the Ground Transportation industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BABA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

2.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 2.23 is within the conventional range for the Broadline Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BABA vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBABAUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.7014.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.044.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.238.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.2222.17