Seek Returns logo

BABA vs. TPR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BABA and TPR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BABA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, TPR is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBABATPR
Company NameAlibaba Group Holding LimitedTapestry, Inc.
CountryHong KongUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization435.84 billion USD23.56 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 19, 2014October 6, 2000
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BABA and TPR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BABA vs. TPR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBABATPR
5-Day Price Return4.17%-0.18%
13-Week Price Return60.38%28.94%
26-Week Price Return34.76%53.66%
52-Week Price Return72.24%136.17%
Month-to-Date Return2.27%11.20%
Year-to-Date Return115.57%73.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume21.92M3.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.44M3.94M
3-Month Volatility49.36%44.31%
Beta0.311.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BABA

14.91%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 14.91% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TPR

10.99%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

TPR’s Return on Equity of 10.99% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

14.82%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.82% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TPR

2.61%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 2.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BABA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

13.98%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

BABA’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.98% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TPR

4.21%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

BABA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBABATPR
Return on Equity (TTM)14.91%10.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.16%2.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.82%2.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.98%4.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.18%75.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.45

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TPR

1.87

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.87 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BABA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

0.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TPR

2.79

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

TPR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.79. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BABA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BABA

9.56

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TPR

3.53

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BABA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBABATPR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.451.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.971.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.232.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.563.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

BABA vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BABA vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BABA

1.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is consistent with its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TPR

1.27%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Yield of 1.27% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BABA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BABA

103.01%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 103.01% is in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

TPR

35.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.71% is within the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BABA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBABATPR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.88%1.27%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)103.01%35.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BABA

20.82

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 20.82 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TPR

128.26

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

At 128.26, TPR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BABA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BABA

3.08

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 3.08 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TPR

3.35

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

TPR’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BABA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.90

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 1.90 is within the conventional range for the Broadline Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TPR

21.26

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

At 21.26, TPR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BABA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBABATPR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.82128.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.083.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.9021.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)39.8221.96