Seek Returns

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

BABA vs. TM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here’s a clear look at BABA and TM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBABATM
Company NameAlibaba Group Holding LimitedToyota Motor Corporation
CountryHong KongJapan
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS Industry GroupConsumer Discretionary Distribution & RetailAutomobiles & Components
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailAutomobiles
GICS Sub-IndustryBroadline RetailAutomobile Manufacturers
Market Capitalization321.85 billion USD226.47 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 19, 2014March 17, 1980
Security TypeADRADR

Both BABA and TM are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

BABA’s market capitalization stands at 321.85 billion USD, while TM’s is 226.47 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

BABA and TM are both American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies without directly engaging with overseas stock exchanges.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BABA and TM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BABA-40.47%
TM+40.33%
BABA vs. TM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBABATM
5-Day Price Return-0.96%-2.48%
13-Week Price Return-24.48%-14.13%
26-Week Price Return-21.36%5.33%
52-Week Price Return9.72%14.38%
Month-to-Date Return3.96%-1.58%
Year-to-Date Return-11.02%-7.27%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.72M19.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume11.20M22.54M
3-Month Volatility35.62%36.06%
Beta0.481.33

TM carries a higher beta at 1.33, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while BABA (beta: 0.48) exhibits greater stability.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BABA

9.06%

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
52.86%
Q3
29.34%
Median
16.16%
Q1
8.94%
Min
-20.75%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 9.06% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TM

9.96%

Automobiles Industry
Max
22.49%
Q3
10.26%
Median
4.03%
Q1
-0.85%
Min
-7.98%

TM’s Return on Equity of 9.96% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. TM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

9.13%

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
23.01%
Q3
12.87%
Median
9.08%
Q1
4.39%
Min
-7.13%

BABA’s Net Profit Margin of 9.13% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TM

7.33%

Automobiles Industry
Max
10.28%
Q3
4.46%
Median
2.25%
Q1
-0.33%
Min
-4.37%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.33% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BABA vs. TM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

7.82%

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
26.71%
Q3
18.18%
Median
11.16%
Q1
7.67%
Min
0.27%

BABA’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.82% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TM

8.55%

Automobiles Industry
Max
12.16%
Q3
5.18%
Median
2.75%
Q1
-1.56%
Min
-6.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 8.55% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BABA vs. TM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBABATM
Return on Equity (TTM)9.06%9.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.01%3.82%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.13%7.33%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.82%8.55%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)40.75%17.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.33

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
3.72
Q3
2.34
Median
1.48
Q1
1.17
Min
0.69

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TM

1.26

Automobiles Industry
Max
2.49
Q3
1.65
Median
1.30
Q1
1.09
Min
0.51

TM’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BABA vs. TM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

0.25

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
2.11
Q3
1.36
Median
0.56
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.25 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TM

1.08

Automobiles Industry
Max
2.13
Q3
1.10
Median
0.92
Q1
0.31
Min
0.11

TM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BABA vs. TM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BABA

9.56

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
9.56
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TM

--

Automobiles Industry
Max
106.73
Q3
41.94
Median
9.73
Q1
-3.78
Min
-19.30

Interest Coverage Ratio data for TM is currently unavailable.

BABA vs. TM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBABATM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.331.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.831.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.251.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.56--

Growth

Revenue Growth

BABA vs. TM: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolBABATM
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)1.67%8.60%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)3.56%7.92%
3-Year Revenue CAGR5.31%15.25%
5-Year Revenue CAGR14.35%9.97%

EPS Growth

BABA vs. TM: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolBABATM
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)-66.84%-42.32%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)-22.23%-26.04%
3-Year EPS CAGR33.08%20.55%
5-Year EPS CAGR-0.85%20.24%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BABA

2.96%

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
5.94%
Q3
2.96%
Median
0.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Yield of 2.96% is consistent with its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TM

3.05%

Automobiles Industry
Max
11.38%
Q3
5.65%
Median
3.21%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

TM’s Dividend Yield of 3.05% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BABA vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BABA

187.88%

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
120.88%
Q3
68.73%
Median
26.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 187.88% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

TM

59.03%

Automobiles Industry
Max
172.78%
Q3
81.19%
Median
40.28%
Q1
1.18%
Min
0.00%

TM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.03% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BABA vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBABATM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.96%3.05%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)187.88%59.03%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BABA

22.81

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
44.72
Q3
26.81
Median
21.64
Q1
9.91
Min
6.38

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 22.81 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TM

10.98

Automobiles Industry
Max
142.28
Q3
64.60
Median
13.60
Q1
8.59
Min
3.87

TM’s P/E Ratio of 10.98 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BABA vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BABA

2.08

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
5.20
Q3
3.09
Median
1.93
Q1
0.96
Min
0.19

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 2.08 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TM

0.80

Automobiles Industry
Max
1.40
Q3
0.87
Median
0.42
Q1
0.24
Min
0.10

TM’s P/S Ratio of 0.80 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BABA vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

2.33

Broadline Retail Industry
Max
9.90
Q3
5.55
Median
3.50
Q1
1.79
Min
0.79

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 2.33 is within the conventional range for the Broadline Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TM

1.12

Automobiles Industry
Max
2.88
Q3
1.71
Median
0.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.28

TM’s P/B Ratio of 1.12 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BABA vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBABATM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.8110.98
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.080.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.331.12
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)212.9455.71