Seek Returns logo

BABA vs. RDDT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BABA and RDDT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BABA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, RDDT is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBABARDDT
Company NameAlibaba Group Holding LimitedReddit, Inc.
CountryHong KongUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryCommunication Services
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailInteractive Media & Services
Market Capitalization436.04 billion USD38.78 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 19, 2014March 21, 2024
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BABA and RDDT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BABA vs. RDDT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBABARDDT
5-Day Price Return4.52%-14.37%
13-Week Price Return72.98%31.95%
26-Week Price Return42.20%97.52%
52-Week Price Return63.15%205.69%
Month-to-Date Return5.20%-9.91%
Year-to-Date Return121.76%26.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume21.92M6.67M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.69M7.21M
3-Month Volatility49.21%66.48%
Beta0.312.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BABA

14.91%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 14.91% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RDDT

9.93%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
33.08%
Median
10.37%
Q1
5.76%
Min
-24.17%

RDDT’s Return on Equity of 9.93% is on par with the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

14.82%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.82% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RDDT

12.97%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.74%
Q3
29.54%
Median
20.53%
Q1
7.52%
Min
-14.52%

RDDT’s Net Profit Margin of 12.97% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

13.98%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

BABA’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.98% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RDDT

7.87%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.82%
Median
18.53%
Q1
7.69%
Min
-18.13%

RDDT’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.87% is around the midpoint for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBABARDDT
Return on Equity (TTM)14.91%9.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.16%9.04%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.82%12.97%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.98%7.87%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.18%91.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.45

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RDDT

12.00

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.72
Median
1.85
Q1
1.20
Min
0.25

RDDT’s Current Ratio of 12.00 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

BABA vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

0.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

RDDT

0.00

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.85
Q3
0.49
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, RDDT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BABA vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BABA

9.56

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RDDT

--

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.65
Q3
16.48
Median
6.73
Q1
-0.87
Min
-3.62

Interest Coverage Ratio data for RDDT is currently unavailable.

BABA vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBABARDDT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.4512.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.9711.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.230.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.56--

Growth

Revenue Growth

BABA vs. RDDT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BABA vs. RDDT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BABA

1.81%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Yield of 1.81% is consistent with its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RDDT

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.07%
Q3
1.27%
Median
0.28%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RDDT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BABA vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BABA

103.01%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 103.01% is in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

RDDT

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
101.53%
Q3
40.64%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RDDT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BABA vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBABARDDT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.81%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)103.01%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BABA

21.53

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 21.53 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RDDT

179.25

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.72
Q3
41.60
Median
25.84
Q1
18.18
Min
1.76

At 179.25, RDDT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BABA vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BABA

3.19

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 3.19 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RDDT

23.25

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.76
Q3
11.40
Median
7.69
Q1
2.49
Min
0.00

RDDT’s P/S Ratio of 23.25 is in the upper echelon for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BABA vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.90

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 1.90 is within the conventional range for the Broadline Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RDDT

11.64

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
16.71
Q3
9.00
Median
3.97
Q1
2.19
Min
0.33

RDDT’s P/B Ratio of 11.64 is in the upper tier for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BABA vs. RDDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBABARDDT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.53179.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.1923.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.9011.64
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.1997.72