Seek Returns logo

BABA vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BABA and IBM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BABA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, IBM is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBABAIBM
Company NameAlibaba Group Holding LimitedInternational Business Machines Corporation
CountryHong KongUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryInformation Technology
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailIT Services
Market Capitalization423.30 billion USD269.64 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 19, 2014January 2, 1962
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BABA and IBM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BABA vs. IBM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBABAIBM
5-Day Price Return-4.34%0.96%
13-Week Price Return74.44%-0.23%
26-Week Price Return40.04%18.88%
52-Week Price Return54.12%27.45%
Month-to-Date Return1.34%2.59%
Year-to-Date Return113.61%31.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume17.34M6.04M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.71M4.74M
3-Month Volatility49.26%26.64%
Beta0.310.67

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BABA

14.91%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 14.91% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IBM

21.99%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.99% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BABA vs. IBM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

14.82%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.82% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IBM

9.11%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. IBM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

13.98%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

BABA’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.98% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IBM

9.77%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.77% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. IBM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBABAIBM
Return on Equity (TTM)14.91%21.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.16%4.12%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.82%9.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.98%9.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.18%57.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.45

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IBM

0.91

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.91 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BABA vs. IBM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

0.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IBM

2.33

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.33. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BABA vs. IBM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BABA

9.56

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BABA vs. IBM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBABAIBM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.450.91
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.970.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.232.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.5645.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

BABA vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BABA vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BABA

1.84%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Yield of 1.84% is consistent with its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IBM

2.29%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.29%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BABA vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BABA

103.01%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 103.01% is in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

IBM

75.57%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 75.57% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

BABA vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBABAIBM
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.84%2.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)103.01%75.57%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BABA

21.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 21.23 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IBM

46.43

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

A P/E Ratio of 46.43 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BABA vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BABA

3.15

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 3.15 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IBM

4.23

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 4.23 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BABA vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.90

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 1.90 is within the conventional range for the Broadline Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IBM

9.96

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.96 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BABA vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBABAIBM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.2346.43
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.154.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.909.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.6023.04