Seek Returns logo

BABA vs. HIMS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BABA and HIMS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BABA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, HIMS is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBABAHIMS
Company NameAlibaba Group Holding LimitedHims & Hers Health, Inc.
CountryHong KongUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryHealth Care
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization302.48 billion USD10.92 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 19, 2014September 13, 2019
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BABA and HIMS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BABA vs. HIMS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBABAHIMS
5-Day Price Return4.88%-5.33%
13-Week Price Return-4.29%-12.46%
26-Week Price Return26.38%19.42%
52-Week Price Return56.79%202.63%
Month-to-Date Return5.16%-26.97%
Year-to-Date Return49.62%99.88%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.40M38.61M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.86M42.15M
3-Month Volatility38.28%110.00%
Beta0.112.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BABA

13.27%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 13.27% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HIMS

38.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

HIMS’s Return on Equity of 38.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BABA vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

12.99%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.99% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HIMS

9.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.62% places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BABA vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

14.14%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

BABA’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.14% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HIMS

6.24%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

HIMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.24% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBABAHIMS
Return on Equity (TTM)13.27%38.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.19%18.98%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.99%9.62%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.14%6.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.95%76.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HIMS

4.98

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

HIMS’s Current Ratio of 4.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

BABA vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

0.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HIMS

1.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

HIMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.72. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BABA vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BABA

9.56

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HIMS

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

Interest Coverage Ratio data for HIMS is currently unavailable.

BABA vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBABAHIMS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.554.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.084.30
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.231.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.56--

Growth

Revenue Growth

BABA vs. HIMS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BABA vs. HIMS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BABA

2.85%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.85%, BABA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BABA vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BABA

103.01%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 103.01% is in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BABA vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBABAHIMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.85%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)103.01%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BABA

15.70

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 15.70 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HIMS

56.42

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

At 56.42, HIMS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BABA vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BABA

2.04

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 2.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HIMS

5.43

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 5.43, HIMS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BABA vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

2.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 2.23 is within the conventional range for the Broadline Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HIMS

19.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

At 19.83, HIMS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BABA vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBABAHIMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.7056.42
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.045.43
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.2319.83
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.2246.19