Seek Returns logo

BABA vs. EBAY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BABA and EBAY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BABA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, EBAY is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBABAEBAY
Company NameAlibaba Group Holding LimitedeBay Inc.
CountryHong KongUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization423.30 billion USD42.08 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 19, 2014September 24, 1998
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BABA and EBAY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BABA vs. EBAY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBABAEBAY
5-Day Price Return-4.34%4.16%
13-Week Price Return74.44%20.65%
26-Week Price Return40.04%38.76%
52-Week Price Return54.12%37.91%
Month-to-Date Return1.34%1.24%
Year-to-Date Return113.61%48.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume17.34M6.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.71M5.88M
3-Month Volatility49.26%44.43%
Beta0.311.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BABA

14.91%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 14.91% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EBAY

43.08%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

In the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, EBAY’s Return on Equity of 43.08% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BABA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

14.82%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.82% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EBAY

20.86%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.86% places EBAY in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BABA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

13.98%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

BABA’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.98% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EBAY

21.38%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.38% places EBAY in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BABA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBABAEBAY
Return on Equity (TTM)14.91%43.08%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.16%11.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.82%20.86%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.98%21.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.18%71.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.45

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EBAY

1.00

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

EBAY’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BABA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

0.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

EBAY

1.42

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

EBAY’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Broadline Retail industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.42. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BABA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BABA

9.56

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EBAY

57.95

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 57.95, EBAY demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

BABA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBABAEBAY
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.451.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.970.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.231.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.5657.95

Growth

Revenue Growth

BABA vs. EBAY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BABA vs. EBAY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BABA

1.84%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Yield of 1.84% is consistent with its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EBAY

1.24%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EBAY’s Dividend Yield of 1.24% is consistent with its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BABA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BABA

103.01%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 103.01% is in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

EBAY

24.13%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EBAY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.13% is within the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BABA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBABAEBAY
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.84%1.24%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)103.01%24.13%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BABA

21.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 21.23 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EBAY

19.48

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

EBAY’s P/E Ratio of 19.48 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BABA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BABA

3.15

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 3.15 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EBAY

4.06

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

EBAY’s P/S Ratio of 4.06 is in the upper echelon for the Broadline Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BABA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.90

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 1.90 is within the conventional range for the Broadline Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EBAY

7.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

EBAY’s P/B Ratio of 7.23 is in the upper tier for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BABA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBABAEBAY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.2319.48
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.154.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.907.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.6020.00