BABA vs. DECK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 24, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BABA and DECK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BABA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, DECK is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	BABA	DECK
Company Name	Alibaba Group Holding Limited	Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Country	Hong Kong	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Broadline Retail	Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization	287.31 billion USD	15.44 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	September 19, 2014	October 15, 1993
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BABA and DECK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BABA vs. DECK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BABA	DECK
5-Day Price Return	-2.28%	0.18%
13-Week Price Return	-2.82%	-18.33%
26-Week Price Return	-0.04%	-34.19%
52-Week Price Return	42.40%	-35.19%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.95%	-2.00%
Year-to-Date Return	40.92%	-48.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume	11.26M	2.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume	14.09M	3.43M
3-Month Volatility	33.97%	58.59%
Beta	0.11	1.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BABA

13.27%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 49.17%
Q3: 28.98%
Median: 19.22%
Q1: 10.86%
Min: -11.14%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 13.27% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

DECK

40.25%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 53.33%
Q3: 26.13%
Median: 18.47%
Q1: 7.99%
Min: -10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Return on Equity of 40.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BABA vs. DECK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

12.99%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 19.78%
Q3: 11.90%
Median: 8.63%
Q1: 5.21%
Min: 0.82%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.99% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

DECK

19.31%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 23.35%
Q3: 13.49%
Median: 8.45%
Q1: 4.18%
Min: -3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.31% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BABA vs. DECK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

14.14%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 27.23%
Q3: 15.96%
Median: 11.13%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: 1.77%

BABA’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.14% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

DECK

23.64%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 29.47%
Q3: 20.87%
Median: 13.00%
Q1: 7.02%
Min: -3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.64% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BABA vs. DECK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BABA	DECK
Return on Equity (TTM)	13.27%	40.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)	7.19%	26.80%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	12.99%	19.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	14.14%	23.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	39.95%	57.63%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 3.54
Q3: 2.42
Median: 1.49
Q1: 1.22
Min: 0.67

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DECK

2.94

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 3.91
Q3: 2.49
Median: 1.89
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.80

DECK’s Current Ratio of 2.94 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

BABA vs. DECK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

0.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 2.14
Q3: 1.34
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

DECK

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 2.67
Q3: 1.29
Median: 0.59
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BABA vs. DECK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BABA

9.56

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 37.34
Q3: 20.63
Median: 11.28
Q1: 4.22
Min: -19.29

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DECK

713.03

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 57.00
Q3: 35.85
Median: 9.20
Q1: 4.29
Min: -32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 713.03, DECK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

BABA vs. DECK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BABA	DECK
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.55	2.94
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.08	2.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.23	0.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	9.56	713.03

Growth

Revenue Growth

BABA vs. DECK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BABA vs. DECK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BABA

2.79%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 5.46%
Q3: 2.38%
Median: 0.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.79%, BABA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 6.59%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 2.59%
Q1: 0.95%
Min: 0.00%

DECK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BABA vs. DECK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BABA

103.01%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 131.17%
Q3: 63.48%
Median: 29.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 103.01% is in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 195.44%
Q3: 106.47%
Median: 58.77%
Q1: 36.52%
Min: 0.00%

DECK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BABA vs. DECK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BABA	DECK
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.79%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	103.01%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BABA

16.04

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 66.12
Q3: 35.17
Median: 16.29
Q1: 10.47
Min: 5.94

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 16.04 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

DECK

15.86

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 63.29
Q3: 34.64
Median: 18.01
Q1: 13.88
Min: 6.04

DECK’s P/E Ratio of 15.86 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BABA vs. DECK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BABA

2.08

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 5.40
Q3: 3.33
Median: 2.04
Q1: 0.80
Min: 0.16

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 2.08 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DECK

3.06

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 5.46
Q3: 3.13
Median: 1.72
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.26

DECK’s P/S Ratio of 3.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BABA vs. DECK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

2.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 9.06
Q3: 5.22
Median: 3.48
Q1: 1.90
Min: 0.74

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 2.23 is within the conventional range for the Broadline Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

DECK

6.24

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 9.76
Q3: 6.00
Median: 3.26
Q1: 1.97
Min: 0.69

DECK’s P/B Ratio of 6.24 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BABA vs. DECK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BABA	DECK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	16.04	15.86
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.08	3.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.23	6.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	26.78	14.49