Seek Returns logo

BABA vs. CCK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BABA and CCK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BABA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, CCK is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBABACCK
Company NameAlibaba Group Holding LimitedCrown Holdings, Inc.
CountryHong KongUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization296.47 billion USD11.66 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 19, 2014March 17, 1980
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BABA and CCK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BABA vs. CCK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBABACCK
5-Day Price Return3.63%0.01%
13-Week Price Return2.36%2.16%
26-Week Price Return-1.14%13.40%
52-Week Price Return49.89%11.64%
Month-to-Date Return3.08%0.85%
Year-to-Date Return46.66%21.18%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.60M0.85M
3-Month Avg. Volume13.48M1.18M
3-Month Volatility34.81%16.20%
Beta0.110.75

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BABA

13.27%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 13.27% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CCK

20.49%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

CCK’s Return on Equity of 20.49% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. CCK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

12.99%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.99% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CCK

4.64%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

CCK’s Net Profit Margin of 4.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. CCK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BABA

14.14%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

BABA’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.14% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CCK

12.89%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

CCK’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.89% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BABA vs. CCK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBABACCK
Return on Equity (TTM)13.27%20.49%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.19%3.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.99%4.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.14%12.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.95%22.30%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

1.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CCK

1.06

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

CCK’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BABA vs. CCK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

0.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CCK

2.24

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

CCK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Containers & Packaging industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BABA vs. CCK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BABA

9.56

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.56 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CCK

6.76

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

CCK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BABA vs. CCK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBABACCK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.551.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.080.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.232.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.566.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

BABA vs. CCK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BABA vs. CCK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BABA

2.79%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.79%, BABA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CCK

1.02%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Yield of 1.02% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BABA vs. CCK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BABA

103.01%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 103.01% is in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CCK

12.16%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.16% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

BABA vs. CCK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBABACCK
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.79%1.02%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)103.01%12.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BABA

16.04

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 16.04 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CCK

21.03

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

CCK’s P/E Ratio of 21.03 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BABA vs. CCK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BABA

2.08

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 2.08 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CCK

0.98

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

CCK’s P/S Ratio of 0.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BABA vs. CCK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BABA

2.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 2.23 is within the conventional range for the Broadline Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CCK

4.15

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

CCK’s P/B Ratio of 4.15 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BABA vs. CCK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBABACCK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.0421.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.080.98
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.234.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.7811.52